Literature DB >> 14526505

Rural-urban differences in ductal carcinoma in situ as a proxy for mammography use over time.

Mario Schootman1, Edward Kinman, Dione Farria.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: With emphasis on increasing use of mammography, the rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast has increased dramatically in the United States starting in the early 1980s. It is unclear if rural and urban women have experienced similar increases.
PURPOSE: To describe differences in incidence of DCIS between rural and urban women 50 to 69 years of age over time. This may be a proxy indicator of mammography use for the early detection of breast cancer.
METHODS: The study population consisted of women 50 to 69 years of age who were diagnosed with DCIS during 1973-1997 and resided in Iowa, Utah, or New Mexico. Data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programs in these states were used in the analysis. Location of the woman's residence was classified into urban when she lived in a county considered a Metropolitan Statistical Area, while she was considered rural if she resided elsewhere at the time of her diagnosis.
FINDINGS: Increases in rates were different between rural (annual percentage change [APC]: 15.1) and urban women (APC: 34.4). During the 1990s among urban women, the rate of DCIS was still increasing (APC: 3.8), while there was no increase among rural women (APC: 0.2). Differences between rural and urban women within these 3 states were also identified.
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest differences in utilization of mammography between both populations; the increase was lower and started later for rural women. Possible reasons for such differences over time are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14526505     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2003.tb00584.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  7 in total

1.  Mammography utilization among Black and White Medicare beneficiaries in high breast cancer mortality US counties.

Authors:  Mandeep K Virk-Baker; Michelle Y Martin; Robert S Levine; Xin Wang; Tim R Nagy; Maria Pisu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Breast cancer stage at diagnosis: is travel time important?

Authors:  Kevin A Henry; Francis P Boscoe; Christopher J Johnson; Daniel W Goldberg; Recinda Sherman; Myles Cockburn
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2011-12

3.  Rural - urban inequalities in late-stage breast cancer: spatial and social dimensions of risk and access.

Authors:  Sara McLafferty; Fahui Wang; Lan Luo; Jared Butler
Journal:  Environ Plann B Plann Des       Date:  2011-08

4.  Barriers and Challenges of Cancer Patients and Their Experience with Patient Navigators in the Rural US/Mexico Border Region.

Authors:  Helen Palomino; Diana Peacher; Eunjeong Ko; Susan I Woodruff; Mercedes Watson
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Rural reversal? Rural-urban disparities in late-stage cancer risk in Illinois.

Authors:  Sara McLafferty; Fahui Wang
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Early cancer detection among rural and urban Californians.

Authors:  Sarah L Blair; Georgia R Sadler; Rebecca Bristol; Courtney Summers; Zanera Tahar; Sidney L Saltzstein
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Cancer resource center of the desert patient navigator program: removing financial barriers to access to cancer care for rural Latinos.

Authors:  Diana Peacher; Helen Palomino; Eunjeong Ko; Susan I Woodruff
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2013-01-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.