Literature DB >> 21461957

Breast cancer stage at diagnosis: is travel time important?

Kevin A Henry1, Francis P Boscoe, Christopher J Johnson, Daniel W Goldberg, Recinda Sherman, Myles Cockburn.   

Abstract

Recent studies have produced inconsistent results in their examination of the potential association between proximity to healthcare or mammography facilities and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Using a multistate dataset, we re-examine this issue by investigating whether travel time to a patient's diagnosing facility or nearest mammography facility impacts breast cancer stage at diagnosis. We studied 161,619 women 40 years and older diagnosed with invasive breast cancer from ten state population based cancer registries in the United States. For each woman, we calculated travel time to their diagnosing facility and nearest mammography facility. Logistic multilevel models of late versus early stage were fitted, and odds ratios were calculated for travel times, controlling for age, race/ethnicity, census tract poverty, rural/urban residence, health insurance, and state random effects. Seventy-six percent of women in the study lived less than 20 min from their diagnosing facility, and 93 percent lived less than 20 min from the nearest mammography facility. Late stage at diagnosis was not associated with increasing travel time to diagnosing facility or nearest mammography facility. Diagnosis age under 50, Hispanic and Non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, high census tract poverty, and no health insurance were all significantly associated with late stage at diagnosis. Travel time to diagnosing facility or nearest mammography facility was not a determinant of late stage of breast cancer at diagnosis, and better geographic proximity did not assure more favorable stage distributions. Other factors beyond geographic proximity that can affect access should be evaluated more closely, including facility capacity, insurance acceptance, public transportation, and travel costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21461957     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-011-9392-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  43 in total

1.  Are there socioeconomic gradients in the quality of data held by UK cancer registries?

Authors:  Jean Adams; Martin White; David Forman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States).

Authors:  Beth A Jones; Amy Dailey; Lisa Calvocoressi; Kam Reams; Stanislav V Kasl; Carol Lee; Helen Hsu
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Breast and cervical cancer screening: impact of health insurance status, ethnicity, and nativity of Latinas.

Authors:  Michael A Rodríguez; Lisa M Ward; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Update on the diagnostic radiology employment market: findings through 2006-2007.

Authors:  Jonathan H Sunshine; C Douglas Maynard
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 5.  Reported drop in mammography : is this cause for concern?

Authors:  Nancy Breen; Kathleen A Cronin; Helen I Meissner; Stephen H Taplin; Florence K Tangka; Jasmin A Tiro; Timothy S McNeel
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J Hsia; E Kemper; C Kiefe; J Zapka; S Sofaer; M Pettinger; D Bowen; M Limacher; L Lillington; E Mason
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Black residential segregation, disparities in spatial access to health care facilities, and late-stage breast cancer diagnosis in metropolitan Detroit.

Authors:  Dajun Dai
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 4.078

8.  Travel time and cancer care: an example of the inverse care law?

Authors:  G Baird; R Flynn; G Baxter; M Donnelly; J Lawrence
Journal:  Rural Remote Health       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 1.759

9.  Characteristics of mammography facility locations and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in Chicago.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tarlov; Shannon N Zenk; Richard T Campbell; Richard B Warnecke; Richard Block
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.671

10.  Women with breast cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: the effect of urban versus rural residence on stage at diagnosis and survival.

Authors:  Hayley Bennett; Roger Marshall; Ian Campbell; Ross Lawrenson
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2007-11-30
View more
  35 in total

Review 1.  Geographic Access to Mammography and Its Relationship to Breast Cancer Screening and Stage at Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jenna A Khan-Gates; Jennifer L Ersek; Jan M Eberth; Swann A Adams; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-07-26

2.  Paths to health equity: Local area variation in progress toward eliminating breast cancer mortality disparities, 1990-2009.

Authors:  George Rust; Shun Zhang; Khusdeep Malhotra; Leroy Reese; Luceta McRoy; Peter Baltrus; Lee Caplan; Robert S Levine
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Disparity in Breast Cancer Late Stage at Diagnosis in Missouri: Does Rural Versus Urban Residence Matter?

Authors:  Faustine Williams; Emmanuel Thompson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-06-20

4.  Rural-Urban Residence and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis Among Postmenopausal Women: The Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  Shawnita Sealy-Jefferson; Molly E Roseland; Michele L Cote; Amy Lehman; Eric A Whitsel; Faheemah N Mustafaa; Jason Booza; Michael S Simon
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Constructing Geographic Areas for Cancer Data Analysis: A Case Study on Late-stage Breast Cancer Risk in Illinois.

Authors:  Fahui Wang; Diansheng Guo; Sara McLafferty
Journal:  Appl Geogr       Date:  2012-06-15

Review 6.  Disadvantaged neighborhoods and racial disparity in breast cancer outcomes: the biological link.

Authors:  Geetanjali Saini; Angela Ogden; Lauren E McCullough; Mylin Torres; Padmashree Rida; Ritu Aneja
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Disparities in Geographic Accessibility of National Cancer Institute Cancer Centers in the United States.

Authors:  Yanqing Xu; Cong Fu; Tracy Onega; Xun Shi; Fahui Wang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-11-11       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 8.  Population and target considerations for triple-negative breast cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Terry Hyslop; Yvonne Michael; Tiffany Avery; Hallgeir Rui
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 9.  Rural residence and cancer outcomes in the United States: issues and challenges.

Authors:  Ashley Meilleur; S V Subramanian; Jesse J Plascak; James L Fisher; Electra D Paskett; Elizabeth B Lamont
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Evaluating and Comparing Methods for Measuring Spatial Access to Mammography Centers in Appalachia (Re-Revised).

Authors:  Joseph Donohoe; Vincent Marshall; Xi Tan; Fabian T Camacho; Roger Anderson; Rajesh Balkrishnan
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2016-01-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.