Literature DB >> 23335830

Rural - urban inequalities in late-stage breast cancer: spatial and social dimensions of risk and access.

Sara McLafferty1, Fahui Wang2, Lan Luo1, Jared Butler1.   

Abstract

Rural - urban inequalities in health and access to health care have long been of concern in health-policy formulation. Understanding these inequalities is critically important in efforts to plan a more effective geographical distribution of public health resources and programs. Socially and ethnically diverse populations are likely to exhibit different rural - urban gradients in health and well-being because of their varying experiences of place environments, yet little is known about the interplay between social and spatial inequalities. Using data from the Illinois State Cancer Registry, we investigate rural - urban inequalities in late-stage breast cancer diagnosis both for the overall population and for African-Americans, and the impacts of socioeconomic deprivation and spatial access to health care. Changes over time are analyzed from 1988 - 92 to 1998 - 2002, periods of heightened breast cancer awareness and increased access to screening. In both time periods, the risk of late-stage diagnosis is highest among patients living in the most urbanized areas, an indication of urban disadvantage. Multilevel modeling results indicate that rural - urban inequalities in risk are associated with differences in the demographic characteristics of area populations and differences in the social and spatial characteristics of the places in which they live. For African-American breast cancer patients, the rural - urban gradient is reversed, with higher risks among patients living outside the city of Chicago, suggesting a distinct set of health-related risks and place experiences that inhibit early breast cancer detection. Findings emphasize the need for combining spatial and social targeting in locating cancer prevention and treatment programs.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 23335830      PMCID: PMC3547633          DOI: 10.1068/b36145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Plann B Plann Des        ISSN: 0265-8135


  46 in total

1.  Deprivation and poor health in rural areas: inequalities hidden by averages.

Authors:  R Haynes; S Gale
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.078

Review 2.  Utilization of mammography. Social and behavioral trends.

Authors:  M C Romans
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Rural-urban differences in cancer care: results from the Lake Superior Rural Cancer Care Project.

Authors:  Thomas E Elliott; Barbara A Elliott; Colleen M Renier; Irina V Haller
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  2004-09

4.  Spatial accessibility to pediatric services.

Authors:  Fabiana Cervigni; Yoichi Suzuki; Takuma Ishii; Akira Hata
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2008-12

5.  Insurance status and the severity of breast cancer at the time of diagnosis.

Authors:  Cherie M Kuzmiak; Sinisa Haberle; Wittaya Padungchaichote; Donglin Zeng; Elodia Cole; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Rural versus urban colorectal and lung cancer patients: differences in stage at presentation.

Authors:  Ian Paquette; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Characteristics of mammography facility locations and stage of breast cancer at diagnosis in Chicago.

Authors:  Elizabeth Tarlov; Shannon N Zenk; Richard T Campbell; Richard B Warnecke; Richard Block
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.671

8.  Women with breast cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand: the effect of urban versus rural residence on stage at diagnosis and survival.

Authors:  Hayley Bennett; Roger Marshall; Ian Campbell; Ross Lawrenson
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  2007-11-30

9.  Understanding and representing 'place' in health research: a relational approach.

Authors:  Steven Cummins; Sarah Curtis; Ana V Diez-Roux; Sally Macintyre
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Effects of residence and race on burden of travel for care: cross sectional analysis of the 2001 US National Household Travel Survey.

Authors:  Janice C Probst; Sarah B Laditka; Jong-Yi Wang; Andrew O Johnson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  21 in total

1.  Regional variation in colorectal cancer testing and geographic availability of care in a publicly insured population.

Authors:  Stephanie B Wheeler; Tzy-Mey Kuo; Ravi K Goyal; Anne-Marie Meyer; Kristen Hassmiller Lich; Emily M Gillen; Seth Tyree; Carmen L Lewis; Trisha M Crutchfield; Christa E Martens; Florence Tangka; Lisa C Richardson; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Disparity in Breast Cancer Late Stage at Diagnosis in Missouri: Does Rural Versus Urban Residence Matter?

Authors:  Faustine Williams; Emmanuel Thompson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-06-20

3.  Impact of travel time and rurality on presentation and outcomes of symptomatic colorectal cancer: a cross-sectional cohort study in primary care.

Authors:  Peninah Murage; Peter Murchie; Max Bachmann; Michael Crawford; Andy Jones
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Multilevel analysis in rural cancer control: A conceptual framework and methodological implications.

Authors:  Whitney E Zahnd; Sara L McLafferty; Jan M Eberth
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Impact of a National Cancer Prevention and Treatment Program on the Prevalence of Late-Stage Breast Cancer Diagnoses in Oklahoma.

Authors:  Amanda Janitz; Aaron M Wendelboe; Ann F Chou; Summer Frank; Angela Watkins; David Thompson; Janis Campbell
Journal:  J Okla State Med Assoc       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug

6.  Rural-Urban Differences in Late-Stage Breast Cancer: Do Associations Differ by Rural-Urban Classification System?

Authors:  Sandi L Pruitt; Jan M Eberth; E Scott Morris; David B Grinsfelder; Erica L Cuate
Journal:  Tex Public Health J       Date:  2015

7.  Protecting Confidentiality in Cancer Registry Data With Geographic Identifiers.

Authors:  Mandi Yu; Jerome Phillip Reiter; Li Zhu; Benmei Liu; Kathleen A Cronin; Eric J Rocky Feuer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Influence of geographic access and socioeconomic characteristics on breast cancer outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Benoit Conti; Audrey Bochaton; Hélène Charreire; Hélène Kitzis-Bonsang; Caroline Desprès; Sandrine Baffert; Charlotte Ngô
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 3.752

9.  Do the classification of areas and distance matter to the assessment results of achieving the treatment targets among type 2 diabetes patients?

Authors:  Maija Toivakka; Tiina Laatikainen; Timo Kumpula; Markku Tykkyläinen
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.918

10.  General practitioner (family physician) workforce in Australia: comparing geographic data from surveys, a mailing list and medicare.

Authors:  Soumya Mazumdar; Paul Konings; Danielle Butler; Ian Stewart McRae
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.