Literature DB >> 14520526

The usefulness of CEA and/or CA19-9 in monitoring for recurrence in gastric cancer patients: a prospective clinical study.

Yutaka Takahashi1, Tetsuo Takeuchi, Junichi Sakamoto, Tetsuya Touge, Masayoshi Mai, Hisanao Ohkura, Susumu Kodaira, Kunio Okajima, Hiroaki Nakazato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies on postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and/or carbohydrate antigen (CA)19-9 monitoring after operation for gastric cancer have been reported, but most have been retrospective.
METHODS: A nationwide observational study was implemented in 135 leading institutions in Japan to evaluate the significance of CEA and/or CA19-9 in postoperative monitoring for recurrence in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Three hundred and twenty-one patients examined in this analysis underwent radical gastrectomy at one of Japan's leading institutions between November 1993 and March 1996 and had been followed up for at least 5 years. Serum levels of CEA and CA19-9 were examined preoperatively and every 3 months postoperatively, with diagnostic imagings, such as chest X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and ultrasonography also being performed every 3 months.
RESULTS: Recurrence was observed in 120 patients (peritoneum, 48; liver 16; lymph node, 16; multiple sites, 25; and others, 12). Sensitivities of CEA and either CEA or CA19-9, or both, for recurrence were 65.8% and 85.0%, respectively, both of which values were significantly higher than the preoperative positivities (28.3% and 45.0%, respectively). In most patients with high preoperative levels CEA and/or CA19-9, these tumor markers increased again at recurrence. Recurrent diseases were detected between 5 months after detection by diagnostic imagings and 12 months before detection by diagnostic imagings (mean of 3.1 +/- 3.6 months before detection by diagnostic imagings) and between 10 months after detection by diagnostic imagings and 13 months before detection by diagnostic imagings (mean of 2.2 +/- 3.9 months before detection by diagnostic imagings) by CEA and CA19-9 monitorings, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that CEA and/or CA19-9 monitoring after operation was useful to predict the recurrence of gastric cancer, especially in almost all the patients with high preoperative levels of these markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14520526     DOI: 10.1007/s10120-003-0240-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  50 in total

1.  Utility of serum tumor markers as an aid in the differential diagnosis of patients with clinical suspicion of cancer and in patients with cancer of unknown primary site.

Authors:  Rafael Molina; Xavier Bosch; Josep M Auge; Xavier Filella; José M Escudero; Víctor Molina; Manel Solé; Alfonso López-Soto
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-12-09

2.  Decreased expression of Bauhinia purpurea lectin is a predictor of gastric cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Takuro Futsukaichi; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Kentaro Nakajima; Tsutomu Daa; Hidefumi Shiroshita; Norio Shiraishi; Seigo Kitano; Masafumi Inomata
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Role of serum tumor markers in monitoring for recurrence of gastric cancer following radical gastrectomy.

Authors:  Seok Reyol Choi; Jin Seok Jang; Jong Hun Lee; Myung Hwan Roh; Min Chan Kim; Won Sup Lee; Waqar Qureshi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Treatment for isolated loco-regional recurrence of gastric adenocarcinoma: does surgery play a role?

Authors:  Fabio Carboni; Pasquale Lepiane; Roberto Santoro; Riccardo Lorusso; Pietro Mancini; Massimo Carlini; Eugenio Santoro
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Preliminary study on proteomics of gastric carcinoma and its clinical significance.

Authors:  Hong-Gang Qian; Jing Shen; Hong Ma; Hua-Chong Ma; Ya-Hui Su; Chun-Yi Hao; Bao-Cai Xing; Xin-Fu Huang; Cheng-Chao Shou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Normal carcinoembryonic antigen indicates benefit from perioperative chemotherapy to gastric carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Shi Chen; Ying-Bo Chen; Yuan-Fang Li; Xing-Yu Feng; Zhi-Wei Zhou; Xiu-Hong Yuan; Chao-Nan Qian
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Serum VEGFR-3 and survival of advanced gastric cancer patients treated with FOLFOX.

Authors:  Xue-Feng Ni; Chang-Ping Wu; Jing-Ting Jiang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  False-positive findings for tumor markers after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takao Ohtsuka; Seiji Sato; Yoshihiko Kitajima; Masayuki Tanaka; Yuji Nakafusa; Kohji Miyazaki
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  The clinical significance of ascitic fluid CEA in advanced gastric cancer with ascites.

Authors:  Minkyu Jung; Hei-Cheul Jeung; Sung Sook Lee; Jun Yong Park; Soojung Hong; Soo Hyeon Lee; Sung Hoon Noh; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sun Young Rha
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Over-expression of Metastasis-associated in Colon Cancer-1 (MACC1) Associates with Better Prognosis of Gastric Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Shao-Hua Ge; Xiao-Jiang Wu; Xiao-Hong Wang; Xiao-Fang Xing; Lian-Hai Zhang; Yu-Bing Zhu; Hong Du; Bin Dong; Ying Hu; Jia-Fu Ji
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.