Literature DB >> 22161237

Utility of serum tumor markers as an aid in the differential diagnosis of patients with clinical suspicion of cancer and in patients with cancer of unknown primary site.

Rafael Molina1, Xavier Bosch, Josep M Auge, Xavier Filella, José M Escudero, Víctor Molina, Manel Solé, Alfonso López-Soto.   

Abstract

Cancer may be diagnosed in advanced stages, when the patient has already developed metastasis, with symptoms that can be also observed in benign diseases. The objective of this study was to evaluate tumor marker sensitivity and specificity in the differential diagnosis of patients with suspected signs of cancer. We studied 2.711 consecutive patients admitted to the Internal Medicine Department of our hospital with suspected cancer; 1.240 patients had non-malignant processes and 1.471 had malignant disease. Determinations were considered positive for suspected malignancy when serum levels were carcinoembryonic antigen >15 ng/ml (>20 in patients with renal failure or liver disease), alpha fetoprotein >40 ng/ml (>80 ng/ml in patients with liver diseases), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19.9 > 200 U/ml (>500 U/ml in patients with liver diseases or gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) <150 UI/L or effusions; >1.000 U/ml in patients with jaundice or GGT > 150 UI/L), neuron-specific enolase >45 ng/ml (renal failure >50 ng/ml; samples with hemolysis were excluded), prostate-specific antigen > 30 ng/ml (excluding acute prostatitis), tumor-associated glycoprotein-72 >80 U/ml, cytokeratin 19 fragment 21-1 > 7.5 ng/ml (>19 ng/ml in patients with renal failure; >11 ng/ml in patients with liver cirrhosis or jaundice), >3.5 ng/ml for squamous cell carcinoma (excluding patients with renal failure or skin disorders), CA 15.3 >100 U/ml, and CA 125 >350 U/ml (>600 U/ml in patients with pleural effusion and >900 U/ml in those with ascites). There was a specificity of 97.6% in patients without malignancy, 67.4% of sensitivity in patients with malignancy, and 75.4% of sensitivity in the 1,280 patients with epithelial tumors (53.7% in patients with locally advanced tumors and 79.4% in patients with metastases). Sensitivity was 81.4% in patients with cancer of unknown primary site. Tumor markers were useful in the differential diagnosis between epithelial and non-epithelial tumors, brain masses (metastases vs. primary tumors), and between benign or malignant origin of different clinical situations such as wasting syndrome, effusions, liver or bone lesions, and effusions with a positive predictive value higher than 95%. Tumor markers are useful as an aid in the evaluation of the risk of cancer of these patients with suspected cancer and may be useful to reduce the hospitalization time, morbidity, and the number of diagnostic tests required for diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22161237     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-011-0275-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  43 in total

1.  The forest and the trees: the human costs of cancer.

Authors:  Larry G Kessler; Scott D Ramsey
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Tumor-marker analysis and verification of prognostic models in patients with cancer of unknown primary, receiving platinum-based combination chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kan Yonemori; Masashi Ando; Taro Shibata; Noriyuki Katsumata; Koji Matsumoto; Yasuhiro Yamanaka; Tsutomu Kouno; Chikako Shimizu; Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 3.  Tumor markers in pancreatic cancer: a European Group on Tumor Markers (EGTM) status report.

Authors:  M J Duffy; C Sturgeon; R Lamerz; C Haglund; V L Holubec; R Klapdor; A Nicolini; O Topolcan; V Heinemann
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  AFP-producing gastric carcinoma: multivariate analysis of prognostic factors in 270 patients.

Authors:  Yosuke Adachi; Junko Tsuchihashi; Norio Shiraishi; Kazuhiro Yasuda; Tsuyoshi Etoh; Seigo Kitano
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.935

5.  The incidence of pleural effusion in a well-defined region. Epidemiologic study in central Bohemia.

Authors:  M Marel; M Zrůstová; B Stasný; R W Light
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Usefulness of serum tumor markers, including progastrin-releasing peptide, in patients with lung cancer: correlation with histology.

Authors:  Rafael Molina; Josep M Augé; Xavier Bosch; José M Escudero; Nuria Viñolas; Ramón Marrades; José Ramírez; Enric Carcereny; Xavier Filella
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2009-06-09

Review 7.  Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use.

Authors:  M J Duffy; A van Dalen; C Haglund; L Hansson; E Holinski-Feder; R Klapdor; R Lamerz; P Peltomaki; C Sturgeon; O Topolcan
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Prospective evaluation of squamous cell carcinoma and carcinoembryonic antigen as prognostic factors in patients with cervical cancer.

Authors:  Rafael Molina; Xavier Filella; Jose A Lejarcegui; Jaime Pahisa; Aurelio Torné; Angels Rovirosa; Begoña Mellado; Jaume Ordi; Luis M Puig-Tintore; Julian Alicarte; Alberto Biete; Javier Iglesias
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2003 May-Jun

Review 9.  Diagnostic and therapeutic management of cancer of an unknown primary.

Authors:  N Pavlidis; E Briasoulis; J Hainsworth; F A Greco
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.162

10.  Evaluation of seven tumour markers in pleural fluid for the diagnosis of malignant effusions.

Authors:  M Miédougé; P Rouzaud; G Salama; M C Pujazon; C Vincent; M A Mauduyt; J Reyre; P Carles; G Serre
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Cancer of unknown primary sites: what radiologists need to know and what oncologists want to know.

Authors:  Kyung Won Kim; Katherine M Krajewski; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Mizuki Nishino; Atul B Shinagare; Jason L Hornick; Nikhil H Ramaiya
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Pleural fluid tumour markers in malignant pleural effusion with inconclusive cytologic results.

Authors:  L Antonangelo; R K Sales; A P Corá; M M P Acencio; L R Teixeira; F S Vargas
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Tumor marker analyses in patients with brain metastases: patterns of practice and implications for survival prediction research.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Astrid Dalhaug; Ellinor Haukland; Bård Mannsåker; Adam Pawinski
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-03-24

4.  Bioluminescence imaging correlates with tumor serum marker, organ weights, histology, and human DNA levels during treatment of orthotopic tumor xenografts with antibodies.

Authors:  Thomas Poeschinger; Anja Renner; Thomas Weber; Werner Scheuer
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Laparoscopic Surgery for a Patient With Multiple Liver Metastases of Unknown Origin Concomitant With Gallbladder Tumor.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Hara; Kensuke Yamamura; Kazuki Matsumura; Eri Oda; Shinichi Akahoshi; Hideaki Yuki; Jun Tomiguchi; Toshihiko Motohara; Hideaki Miyamoto; Yoshihiko Komohara; Toru Beppu
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Consensus of the Spanish society of laboratory medicine and the Spanish society of medical oncology on the methodology and criteria for evaluation of circulating tumour markers in breast cancer.

Authors:  F Ayala de la Peña; B Ortiz-Muñoz; T Quintanar-Verdúguez; J D Santotoribio; S de la Cruz; J Trapé-Pujol; E Galve-Calvo; J M Augé-Fradera; J García-Gómez; Á González-Hernández
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-02-07       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Tumour Markers in the Differential Diagnosis of Patients With Isolated Involuntary Weight Loss.

Authors:  Jaume Trape; Jordi Aligue; Mireia Vicente; Anna Arnau; Antonio San-Jose; Josep Ordeig; Roser Ordeig; Mariona Bonet; Andres Abril; Omar El-Boutrouki; Carolina Gonzalez-Fernandez; Maria Sala; Cristina Figols; Elisabeth Gonzalez-Garcia; Lourdes Montsant; Domingo Ruiz
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

8.  Diagnostic value of tumor markers in identifying favorable or unfavorable subsets in patients with cancer of unknown primary: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Shigemasa Takamizawa; Tatsunori Shimoi; Masayuki Yoshida; Momoko Tokura; Shu Yazaki; Chiharu Mizoguchi; Ayumi Saito; Shosuke Kita; Kasumi Yamamoto; Yuki Kojima; Hitomi Sumiyoshi-Okuma; Tadaaki Nishikawa; Emi Noguchi; Kazuki Sudo; Kan Yonemori
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Overexpression of LAPTM4B-35: a novel marker of poor prognosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hongtuan Zhang; Qiang Wei; Ranlu Liu; Shiyong Qi; Peihe Liang; Can Qi; Andi Wang; Bin Sheng; Liang Li; Yong Xu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Building the Evidence Base of Blood-Based Biomarkers for Early Detection of Cancer: A Rapid Systematic Mapping Review.

Authors:  Lesley Uttley; Becky L Whiteman; Helen Buckley Woods; Susan Harnan; Sian Taylor Philips; Ian A Cree
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2016-07-06       Impact factor: 8.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.