Literature DB >> 18523781

Magnetic resonance imaging of inflammatory breast carcinoma and acute mastitis. A comparative study.

Diane M Renz1, Pascal A T Baltzer, Joachim Böttcher, Fady Thaher, Mieczyslaw Gajda, Oumar Camara, Ingo B Runnebaum, Werner A Kaiser.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential of magnetic resonance mammography (MRM) to distinguish inflammatory breast carcinomas (IBC) from acute mastitis (AM). This study compared MRM examinations of two selected groups of patients: 48 subjects with IBC and 42 patients with AM. No statistical differences were revealed between the two groups for morphology of masses and of non-mass-like enhancement, breast enlargement, diffuse skin thickening, abnormal nipple configuration, prominent vessels, and also for cutaneous/subcutaneous, perimamillar and diffuse oedema. However, initial and postinitial dynamic characteristics significantly differed between the two groups (p < 0.001). In IBC, more masses with a greater average size were detected (p < 0.05). The following morphological criteria were also observed more often in IBC (p < 0.05): T2-hypointensity of masses (77.5%/18.2%), blooming sign (62.5%/31.8%), infiltration of pectoralis major muscle (interruption of fat plane: 54.2%/16.7%; pathological enhancement: 33.3%/7.1%), perifocal (66.7%/33.3%), prepectoral (72.9%/31.0%) and intramuscular pectoral oedema (41.7%/7.1%). The main localisation of AM was subareolar, of IBC central or dorsal (p < 0.001). The discrimination between AM and IBC remains a diagnostic challenge because of overlapping imaging features. However, the combination of multiple dynamic and morphological MRM criteria seems to have the potential for a differential diagnosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18523781     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1029-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  34 in total

1.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?

Authors:  C K Kuhl; P Mielcareck; S Klaschik; C Leutner; E Wardelmann; J Gieseke; H H Schild
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Inflammatory breast cancer: imaging findings.

Authors:  Kyung Won Lee; Soo Young Chung; Ik Yang; Hong Dae Kim; Sang June Shin; Jung Eun Kim; Bong Wha Chung; Jung-Ah Choi
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.605

3.  Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.

Authors:  H Sherif; A E Mahfouz; H Oellinger; J Hadijuana; J U Blohmer; M Taupitz; R Felix; B Hamm
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Prospective evaluation of pectoralis muscle invasion of breast cancer by MR imaging.

Authors:  Toshiki Kazama; Seigo Nakamura; Osamu Doi; Koyu Suzuki; Masanori Hirose; Hisao Ito
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions.

Authors:  S H Heywang-Köbrunner; P Viehweg; A Heinig; C Küchler
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Classification of hypervascularized lesions in CE MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  F Baum; U Fischer; R Vosshenrich; E Grabbe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-02-02       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Is the "blooming sign" a promising additional tool to determine malignancy in MR mammography?

Authors:  D R Fischer; P Baltzer; A Malich; S Wurdinger; M G Freesmeyer; C Marx; W A Kaiser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Mammographic and sonographic spectrum of non-puerperal mastitis.

Authors:  M H Lequin; J van Spengler; R van Pel; C van Eijck; H van Overhagen
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  1995-12-15       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Changes in magnetic resonance mammography due to hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Stefan O R Pfleiderer; Steffen Sachse; Dieter Sauner; Christiane Marx; Ansgar Malich; Susanne Wurdinger; Werner A Kaiser
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  Update on inflammatory breast cancer.

Authors:  Florence Lerebours; Ivan Bieche; Rosette Lidereau
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-01-20       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  16 in total

1.  Inflammatory breast carcinoma and locally advanced breast carcinoma: characterisation with MR imaging.

Authors:  V Girardi; G Carbognin; L Camera; F Bonetti; E Manfrin; G Pollini; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance examinations are effective for the accurate diagnosis of mammary duct ectasia.

Authors:  Feixue Zhang; Dexin Yu; Mingming Guo; Qing Wang; Zhigang Yu; Fei Zhou; Meng Zhao; Feng Xue; Guangrui Shao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

3.  Impact of skin removal on quantitative measurement of breast density using MRI.

Authors:  Ke Nie; Daniel Chang; Jeon-Hor Chen; Tzu-Ching Shih; Chieh-Chih Hsu; Orhan Nalcioglu; Min-Ying Su
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  Mastitis: comparative etiology and epidemiology.

Authors:  G Andres Contreras; Juan Miguel Rodríguez
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 5.  Current and future applications of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to breast and ovarian cancer patient management.

Authors:  Jim Klostergaard; Kenia Parga; Raphael G Raptis
Journal:  P R Health Sci J       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.705

6.  Differential diagnosis of plasma cell mastitis and invasive ductal carcinoma using multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Rong Chen; Baoquan Hu; Yulong Zhang; Caibao Liu; Lianhua Zhao; Yan Jiang; Yan Xu
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-04

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pathologic nipple discharge: indications and imaging findings.

Authors:  Naziya Samreen; Laura B Madsen; Celin Chacko; Samantha L Heller
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 8.  Magnetic resonance in the detection of breast cancers of different histological types.

Authors:  Rebecca M Mayrhofer; Hsiao Piau Ng; Thomas C Putti; Philip W Kuchel
Journal:  Magn Reson Insights       Date:  2013-04-30

9.  A computer-aided diagnosis system for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images based on level set segmentation and ReliefF feature selection.

Authors:  Zhiyong Pang; Dongmei Zhu; Dihu Chen; Li Li; Yuanzhi Shao
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.238

10.  A rim-enhanced mass with central cystic changes on MR imaging: how to distinguish breast cancer from inflammatory breast diseases?

Authors:  Lijun Wang; Dengbin Wang; Xiaochun Fei; Mei Ruan; Weimin Chai; Lin Xu; Xiaoxiao Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.