Literature DB >> 15930123

Tension-dependent regulation of microtubule dynamics at kinetochores can explain metaphase congression in yeast.

Melissa K Gardner1, Chad G Pearson, Brian L Sprague, Ted R Zarzar, Kerry Bloom, E D Salmon, David J Odde.   

Abstract

During metaphase in budding yeast mitosis, sister kinetochores are tethered to opposite poles and separated, stretching their intervening chromatin, by singly attached kinetochore microtubules (kMTs). Kinetochore movements are coupled to single microtubule plus-end polymerization/depolymerization at kinetochore attachment sites. Here, we use computer modeling to test possible mechanisms controlling chromosome alignment during yeast metaphase by simulating experiments that determine the 1) mean positions of kinetochore Cse4-GFP, 2) extent of oscillation of kinetochores during metaphase as measured by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of kinetochore Cse4-GFP, 3) dynamics of kMTs as measured by FRAP of GFP-tubulin, and 4) mean positions of unreplicated chromosome kinetochores that lack pulling forces from a sister kinetochore. We rule out a number of possible models and find the best fit between theory and experiment when it is assumed that kinetochores sense both a spatial gradient that suppresses kMT catastrophe near the poles and attachment site tension that promotes kMT rescue at higher amounts of chromatin stretch.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15930123      PMCID: PMC1182314          DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e05-04-0275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Cell        ISSN: 1059-1524            Impact factor:   4.138


  53 in total

1.  Estimates of lateral and longitudinal bond energies within the microtubule lattice.

Authors:  Vincent VanBuren; David J Odde; Lynne Cassimeris
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanical disruption of individual nucleosomes reveals a reversible multistage release of DNA.

Authors:  Brent D Brower-Toland; Corey L Smith; Richard C Yeh; John T Lis; Craig L Peterson; Michelle D Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Dynamics and mechanics of the microtubule plus end.

Authors:  Joe Howard; Anthony A Hyman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  Cell division.

Authors:  Jonathan M Scholey; Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Alex Mogilner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Centromeres and kinetochores: from epigenetics to mitotic checkpoint signaling.

Authors:  Don W Cleveland; Yinghui Mao; Kevin F Sullivan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2003-02-21       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  beta-Tubulin C354 mutations that severely decrease microtubule dynamics do not prevent nuclear migration in yeast.

Authors:  Mohan L Gupta; Claudia J Bode; Douglas A Thrower; Chad G Pearson; Kathy A Suprenant; Kerry S Bloom; Richard H Himes
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 7.  Attachment and tension in the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  Jun Zhou; Joyce Yao; Harish C Joshi
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast.

Authors:  X He; S Asthana; P K Sorger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-06-23       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  Segregating sister genomes: the molecular biology of chromosome separation.

Authors:  Kim Nasmyth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Simple centromere, complex kinetochore: linking spindle microtubules and centromeric DNA in budding yeast.

Authors:  Iain M Cheeseman; David G Drubin; Georjana Barnes
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  82 in total

Review 1.  Biophysics of mitosis.

Authors:  J Richard McIntosh; Maxim I Molodtsov; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.318

2.  Providing positional information with active transport on dynamic microtubules.

Authors:  Christian Tischer; Pieter Rein Ten Wolde; Marileen Dogterom
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Cytoskeletal dynamics in fission yeast: a review of models for polarization and division.

Authors:  Tyler Drake; Dimitrios Vavylonis
Journal:  HFSP J       Date:  2010-04-15

4.  Model for Protein Concentration Gradients in the Cytoplasm.

Authors:  Karen Lipkow; David J Odde
Journal:  Cell Mol Bioeng       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 2.321

5.  Cdt1 throws kinetochore-microtubule attachments for a loop.

Authors:  Daniel R Matson; P Todd Stukenberg
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 28.824

6.  Minimal model for collective kinetochore-microtubule dynamics.

Authors:  Edward J Banigan; Kevin K Chiou; Edward R Ballister; Alyssa M Mayo; Michael A Lampson; Andrea J Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  S. cerevisiae chromosomes biorient via gradual resolution of syntely between S phase and anaphase.

Authors:  Eugenio Marco; Jonas F Dorn; Pei-Hsin Hsu; Khuloud Jaqaman; Peter K Sorger; Gaudenz Danuser
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Kif18A and chromokinesins confine centromere movements via microtubule growth suppression and spatial control of kinetochore tension.

Authors:  Jason Stumpff; Michael Wagenbach; Andrew Franck; Charles L Asbury; Linda Wordeman
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 12.270

9.  Measuring nanometer scale gradients in spindle microtubule dynamics using model convolution microscopy.

Authors:  Chad G Pearson; Melissa K Gardner; Leocadia V Paliulis; E D Salmon; David J Odde; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 10.  Microtubule catastrophe and rescue.

Authors:  Melissa K Gardner; Marija Zanic; Jonathon Howard
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 8.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.