Literature DB >> 14514987

An overlying fat panniculus affects femur bone mass measurement.

Neil Binkley1, Diane Krueger, Nellie Vallarta-Ast.   

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is currently the gold standard technique for osteoporosis diagnosis. However, DXA has limitations, including artifacts, such as degenerative disease or metallic foreign bodies, that may confound bone mineral density (BMD) results. Because fat folds overlying the proximal femur may alter soft-tissue density in a nonuniform manner, this may be a currently unappreciated confounder of proximal femur BMD measurement. This possibility was evaluated in 127 patients (52 women/75 men) referred for routine BMD measurement who were identified as having a fat panniculus overlying their proximal femur scan area. Presence of a fat panniculus within the scan field was confirmed by visual assessment of images obtained utilizing a GE Lunar Expert-XL. Subsequently, these individuals were rescanned while retracting their fat panniculus away from the femur scan area without other repositioning between scans. In 49% of the men, and 56% of the women, either the femoral neck, trochanter, or total femur BMD differed by more than the least significant change at our facility. No pattern was observed to predict whether BMD would increase or decrease upon fat retraction. Subsequently, 30 patients were scanned using the standard and retracted technique twice, with repositioning between scans to establish precision. Retracted and standard precision was similar. In conclusion, an overlying fat panniculus may alter proximal femur BMD measurement, which would be expected to impair the ability to accurately diagnose low bone mass and monitor osteoporosis therapy. When a fat panniculus overlays the proximal femur scan area, its retraction should be part of routine densitometric practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14514987     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:6:3:199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  19 in total

1.  The effect of weight and weight change on the long-term precision of spine and hip DXA measurements.

Authors:  R Rajamanohara; J Robinson; J Rymer; R Patel; I Fogelman; G M Blake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  P Tothill; W J Hannan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Two-year changes in bone density after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery.

Authors:  Elaine W Yu; Mary L Bouxsein; Melissa S Putman; Elizabeth L Monis; Adam E Roy; Janey S A Pratt; W Scott Butsch; Joel S Finkelstein
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry underestimates in vivo lumbar spine bone mineral density in overweight rats.

Authors:  Rim Cherif; Laurence Vico; Norbert Laroche; Mohsen Sakly; Nebil Attia; Cedric Lavet
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.626

5.  Effects of obesity and diabetes on rate of bone density loss.

Authors:  W D Leslie; S N Morin; S R Majumdar; L M Lix
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Osteoporosis imaging: state of the art and advanced imaging.

Authors:  Thomas M Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Simulated increases in body fat and errors in bone mineral density measurements by DXA and QCT.

Authors:  Elaine W Yu; Bijoy J Thomas; J Keenan Brown; Joel S Finkelstein
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Women with severe obesity and relatively low bone mineral density have increased fracture risk.

Authors:  S Cawsey; R Padwal; A M Sharma; X Wang; S Li; K Siminoski
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effect of impact exercise on bone mineral density in elderly women with low BMD: a population-based randomized controlled 30-month intervention.

Authors:  Raija Korpelainen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Jorma Heikkinen; Kalervo Väänänen; Juha Korpelainen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Bone mineralization is elevated and less heterogeneous in adults with type 2 diabetes and osteoarthritis compared to controls with osteoarthritis alone.

Authors:  J M Pritchard; A Papaioannou; C Tomowich; L M Giangregorio; S A Atkinson; K A Beattie; J D Adachi; J DeBeer; M Winemaker; V Avram; H P Schwarcz
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.