Literature DB >> 14511542

Electrophysiological correlates of age and gender perception on human faces.

Y Mouchetant-Rostaing1, M H Giard.   

Abstract

In a previous experiment using scalp event-related potentials (ERPs), we have described the neuroelectric activities associated with the processing of gender information on human faces (Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Bentin, Aguera, & Pernier, 2000). Here we extend this study by examining the processing of age on faces using a similar experimental paradigm, and we compare age and gender processing. In one session, faces were of the same gender (women) and of one age range (young or old), to reduce gender and age processing. In a second session, faces of young and old women were randomly intermixed but age was irrelevant for the task, hence, age discrimination, if any, was assumed to be incidental. In the third and fourth sessions, faces had to be explicitly categorized according to their age or gender, respectively (intentional discrimination). Neither age nor gender processing affected the occipito-temporal N170 component often associated with the detection of physiognomic features and global structural encoding of faces. Rather, the three age and gender discrimination conditions induced similar fronto-central activities around 145-185 msec. In our previous experiment, this ERP pattern was also found for implicit and explicit categorization of gender from faces but not in a control condition manipulating hand stimuli (Mouchetant-Rostaing, Giard, Bentin, et al., 2000). Whatever their exact nature, these 145-185 msec effects therefore suggest, first, that similar mechanisms could be engaged in age and gender perception, and second, that age and gender may be implicitly processed irrespective of their relevance to the task, through somewhat specialized mechanisms. Additional ERP effects were found at early latencies (45-90 msec) in all three discrimination conditions, and around 200-400 msec during explicit age and gender discrimination. These effects have been previously found in control conditions manipulating nonfacial stimuli and may therefore be related to more general categorization processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14511542     DOI: 10.1162/089892903322370816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  17 in total

1.  The influence of processing objectives on the perception of faces: an ERP study of race and gender perception.

Authors:  Tiffany A Ito; Geoffrey R Urland
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Early dissociation of face and object processing: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Ana Susac; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Elina Pihko; Jussi Nurminen; Selma Supek
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Knowledge is power: how conceptual knowledge transforms visual cognition.

Authors:  Jessica A Collins; Ingrid R Olson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

4.  What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias.

Authors:  Nicole Wolff; Kathleen Kemter; Stefan R Schweinberger; Holger Wiese
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Multiple Cues in Social Perception: The Time Course of Processing Race and Facial Expression.

Authors:  Jennifer T Kubota; Tiffany A Ito
Journal:  J Exp Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-09

6.  Recognition of immaturity and emotional expressions in blended faces by children with autism and other developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Thomas F Gross
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-06-05

7.  Reverse-correlating mental representations of sex-typed bodies: the effect of number of trials on image quality.

Authors:  David J Lick; Colleen M Carpinella; Mariana A Preciado; Robert P Spunt; Kerri L Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-07-30

8.  Face-sensitive processes one hundred milliseconds after picture onset.

Authors:  Benjamin Dering; Clara D Martin; Sancho Moro; Alan J Pegna; Guillaume Thierry
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Implicit and Explicit Processes in Risk Perception: Neural Antecedents of Perceived HIV Risk.

Authors:  Ralf Schmälzle; Harald T Schupp; Alexander Barth; Britta Renner
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Spontaneous gender categorization in masking and priming studies: key for distinguishing Jane from John Doe but not Madonna from Sinatra.

Authors:  Ruth Habibi; Beena Khurana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.