Literature DB >> 18344191

Early dissociation of face and object processing: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Ana Susac1, Risto J Ilmoniemi, Elina Pihko, Jussi Nurminen, Selma Supek.   

Abstract

The early dissociation in cortical responses to faces and objects was explored with magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings and source localization. To control for differences in the low-level stimulus features, which are known to modulate early brain responses, we created a novel set of stimuli so that their combinations did not have any differences in the visual-field location, spatial frequency, or luminance contrast. Differing responses to face and object (flower) stimuli were found at about 100 ms after stimulus onset in the occipital cortex. Our data also confirm that the brain response to a complex visual stimulus is not merely a sum of the responses to its constituent parts; the nonlinearity in the response was largest for meaningful stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 18344191      PMCID: PMC6870775          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  62 in total

1.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG.

Authors:  E Halgren; T Raij; K Marinkovic; V Jousmäki; R Hari
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Dynamics of visual feature analysis and object-level processing in face versus letter-string perception.

Authors:  A Tarkiainen; P L Cornelissen; R Salmelin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Early processing of the six basic facial emotional expressions.

Authors:  Magali Batty; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-10

4.  A principled method for determining the functionality of brain responses.

Authors:  Philippe G Schyns; Ines Jentzsch; Mark Johnson; Stefan R Schweinberger; Frédéric Gosselin
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Affective judgments of faces modulate early activity (approximately 160 ms) within the fusiform gyri.

Authors:  Diegon A Pizzagalli; Dietrich Lehmann; Andrew M Hendrick; Marianne Regard; Roberto D Pascual-Marqui; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Spatial scaling factors explain eccentricity effects on face ERPs.

Authors:  Guillaume A Rousselet; Jesse S Husk; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Stronger occipital cortical activation to lower than upper visual field stimuli. Neuromagnetic recordings.

Authors:  K Portin; S Vanni; V Virsu; R Hari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Face-specific responses from the human inferior occipito-temporal cortex.

Authors:  M Sams; J K Hietanen; R Hari; R J Ilmoniemi; O V Lounasmaa
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Luminance and spatial attention effects on early visual processing.

Authors:  S Johannes; T F Münte; H J Heinze; G R Mangun
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1995-07

10.  Seeing faces activates three separate areas outside the occipital visual cortex in man.

Authors:  S T Lu; M S Hämäläinen; R Hari; R J Ilmoniemi; O V Lounasmaa; M Sams; V Vilkman
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.590

View more
  6 in total

1.  Face activated neurodynamic cortical networks.

Authors:  Ana Susac; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Doug Ranken; Selma Supek
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Attention modulates topology and dynamics of auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Sanja Josef Golubic; Miljenka Jelena Jurasic; Ana Susac; Ralph Huonker; Theresa Gotz; Jens Haueisen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  A magnetoencephalographic study of face processing: M170, gamma-band oscillations and source localization.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Abraham Goldstein; Yuval Harpaz; Myriam Hansel; Elana Zion-Golumbic; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Facial Cosmetics Exert a Greater Influence on Processing of the Mouth Relative to the Eyes: Evidence from the N170 Event-Related Potential Component.

Authors:  Hideaki Tanaka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-05

5.  MEG biomarker of Alzheimer's disease: Absence of a prefrontal generator during auditory sensory gating.

Authors:  Sanja Josef Golubic; Cheryl J Aine; Julia M Stephen; John C Adair; Janice E Knoefel; Selma Supek
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Different neural processes accompany self-recognition in photographs across the lifespan: an ERP study using dizygotic twins.

Authors:  David L Butler; Jason B Mattingley; Ross Cunnington; Thomas Suddendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.