Literature DB >> 14507296

Viscoelastic behavior and structural properties of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Ryan S Costic1, Albert Vangura, Jim A Fenwick, Mark W Rodosky, Richard E Debski.   

Abstract

During contact sports such as football, hockey or rugby, the coracoclavicular ligaments are commonly ruptured. Currently, the limited biomechanical data on the properties and function of these ligaments have led to debate on the "gold standard" treatment for these injuries. Therefore, the objective of this study was to characterize the geometry, viscoelastic behavior and structural properties of the coracoclavicular ligaments (n=11). The trapezoid and conoid were found to have similar length (9.6+/-4.4 vs. 11.2+/-4.1 mm) and cross-sectional area (103+/-43 vs. 69+/-51 mm2), respectively (P>0.05). Static and cyclic stress relaxation tests were then performed, followed by uniaxial tensile testing with the insertions of each ligament aligned to ensure a uniform distribution of load across the fibers. No significant differences were observed for the trapezoid and conoid during the static (36+/-8% vs. 31+/-7%) and cyclic (23+/-12% vs. 16+/-6%) stress relaxation tests, respectively (P>0.05). Similarly, no statistically significant differences were found between the trapezoid and conoid for linear stiffness (83+/-40 vs. 70+/-23 N mm(-1)), ultimate load (312+/-133 vs. 266+/- 108 N), energy absorbed at failure (820+/-576 vs. 752+/- 410 N mm), percent elongation (74+/-47% vs. 62+/-22%) and elongation at failure (5.8+/-2.2 vs. 6.1+/-1.6 mm), respectively (P>0.05). A comparison of our data to previous studies suggests that the complex fiber orientation of these ligaments has a significant role in determining the maximum load that can be transferred between the clavicle and scapula by each bone-ligament-bone complex. Our findings also further confirm the functional role of the coracoclavicular ligaments in supporting the upper extremity, and provide data for reconstruction and rehabilitation protocols as well as computational models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14507296     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0838.2003.00335.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports        ISSN: 0905-7188            Impact factor:   4.221


  11 in total

1.  Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison of tendon graft repairs to a synthetic double bundle augmentation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Jan P Kempka; Steffen Schanz; Thore Zantop; Hazibullah Waizy; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Biomechanics of a new technique for minimal-invasive coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Benedikt Schliemann; Simon Lenschow; Peter Schürmann; Mike Schroeglmann; Mirco Herbort; Clemens Kösters; Michael J Raschke
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  [Minimally Invasive Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction (MINAR)].

Authors:  Wolf Petersen; Mathias Wellmann; Steffen Rosslenbroich; Thore Zantop
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Anatomical principles for minimally invasive reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint with anchors.

Authors:  Chuanzhi Xiong; Yaojia Lu; Qiang Wang; Gang Chen; Hansheng Hu; Zhihua Lu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics and evaluation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Carmine DE Ieso; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-07-08

6.  All arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with fiberwire and endobutton system.

Authors:  Marco Spoliti; Mauro De Cupis; Alessio Giai Via; Francesco Oliva
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2015-02-05

7.  [Diseases of the acromioclavicular joint].

Authors:  M Tauber
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Early clinical and radiographic results of fixation with the TightRope device for Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A retrospective review of 15 patients.

Authors:  Raşit Özcafer; Kutalmış Albayrak; Osman Lapçin; Engin Çetinkaya; Yavuz Arıkan; Murat Gül
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.511

9.  Prevalence of concomitant intraarticular lesions in patients treated operatively for high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.

Authors:  Stephan Pauly; Christian Gerhardt; Norbert P Haas; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Acromioclavicular dislocation: postoperative evaluation of the coracoclavicular ligaments using magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Rafael Salomon Silva Faria; Fabiano Rebouças Ribeiro; Bruno de Oliveira Amin; Antonio Carlos Tenor Junior; Miguel Pereira da Costa; Cantídio Salvador Filardi Filho; Cleber Gonçalves Batista; Rômulo Brasil Filho
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-04-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.