Literature DB >> 33155554

Early clinical and radiographic results of fixation with the TightRope device for Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: A retrospective review of 15 patients.

Raşit Özcafer1, Kutalmış Albayrak1, Osman Lapçin2, Engin Çetinkaya1, Yavuz Arıkan1, Murat Gül2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were, first, to assess the loss of reduction after fixation of Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocation (ACJD) with the TightRope device (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA) and, second, to present the functional and radiological outcomes of this treatment.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 15 patients (12 males; mean age=39.2 years; age range=23-61) with Rockwood type V ACJD who were treated by the TightRope fixation device. The mean follow-up period was 19.3 (range=12-30) months. Functional status was assessed using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) at the final follow-up examination. To determine the reduction loss of ACJ, we measured and compared the coracoclavicular (CC) distance using radiographs with Zanca view in the early postoperative period and at the final follow-up examination. The fixation procedures were performed with an open technique using the TightRope fixation device.
RESULTS: The mean CMS at the final follow-up was 93.2 (range=82-100) points. All the patients experienced full recovery of the shoulder's range of motion, were able to return to the activities of daily living, and were satisfied with the treatment. ACJ reduction was successfully achieved in all the patients using the TightRope technique. Postoperative radiographs revealed no reduction loss in the ACJ, and the CC distance was well maintained. The mean CC distance was 19.95 (range=13.1-28.3) mm before surgery. The mean CC distance was 7.47 (range=4.2-11.5) mm in the early postoperative radiographic measurements. This difference was statistically significant (p=0.001). The mean CC distance at the final follow-up examination was 7.70 (range=4.5-11.7) mm. At the final follow-up visit, the shoulders of all the patients were still completely reduced, with a mean difference in the CC of 0.23 (range=0-1.3) mm compared with that in the early postoperative period. The difference in the CC between the early postoperative and final follow-up intervals was not statistically significant (p=0.055). No patient experienced recurrence or required an operation for hardware removal.
CONCLUSION: It seems that the TightRope device can provide anatomical restoration in patients with acute type V ACJD without subluxation at the final follow-up examination. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33155554      PMCID: PMC7646608          DOI: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.18407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc        ISSN: 1017-995X            Impact factor:   1.511


  37 in total

1.  Anatomic considerations of transclavicular-transcoracoid drilling for coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Robert M Coale; Scott J Hollister; Joshua S Dines; Answorth A Allen; Asheesh Bedi
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study of three techniques.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Boyko Gueorguiev; Bojan Stimec; Jean Fasel; Stephan Rothstock; Pierre Hoffmeyer
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury.

Authors:  Emilio Calvo; Mariano López-Franco; Ignacio M Arribas
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint.

Authors:  J A Fraser-Moodie; N L Shortt; C M Robinson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2008-06

5.  The use of a hook-plate in the management of acromioclavicular injuries. Report of ten cases.

Authors:  A A Faraj; B Ketzer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 0.500

6.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation.

Authors:  J K Weaver; H K Dunn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Biomechanical evaluation of minimally invasive repairs for complete acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Mathias Wellmann; Thore Zantop; Andre Weimann; Michael J Raschke; Wolf Petersen
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations treated with triple button device (MINAR): Preliminary results.

Authors:  José Antonio Cano-Martínez; Gregorio Nicolás-Serrano; Julio Bento-Gerard; Francisco Picazo-Marín; Josefina Andrés-Grau
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Incidence of associated injuries with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations types III through V.

Authors:  Thomas Tischer; Gian Max Salzmann; Hosam El-Azab; Stephan Vogt; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  1 in total

1.  A modified single-endobutton technique combined with nice knot for treatment of Rockwood type III or V acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Fangning Hu; Shumei Han; Fanxiao Liu; Zhuang Wang; Honglei Jia; Fu Wang; Lingfei Hu; Jing Chen; Bomin Wang; Yongliang Yang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 2.362

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.