Literature DB >> 25767774

All arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with fiberwire and endobutton system.

Marco Spoliti1, Mauro De Cupis2, Alessio Giai Via2, Francesco Oliva2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is common in athletes and in contact sports and about 9% of shoulder injuries involves this joint. The majority of these AC lesions can be successfully treated conservatively but high grade dislocation and some cases of type III dislocation need a surgical treatment. Many different operative techniques have been described over the years. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the results of arthroscopic stabilization of AC joint dislocation with TightRope® system.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: nineteen patients with acute AC dislocation were treated by arthroscopic fixation with TightRope® system. Any associated lesions were repaired. All patients were assessed before surgery (T0), at 3 months (T1), at 6 months (T2) and at 1 year after the surgery (T3) using a visual analogic scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley Score (CMS). All patients were evaluated with X-ray.
RESULTS: six AC-joint dislocations involved the right shoulder and thirteen the left shoulder. Ten were type III dislocation, three were type IV and six were type V dislocation. We found a statistically significant reduction of pain (p< 0.01) at T1 compared to the pretreatment scores. The CMS measures showed an improvement between T1, T2 and T3, but the difference was statistically significant only between T1 and T3 (p= 0.017). The postoperative X-Ray of the shoulder showed a good reduction of the AC joint dislocation. We had 1 case of recurrence and 2 cases of loss of intraoperative reduction.
CONCLUSION: arthroscopic technique for acute AC joint dislocations with the use of the TightRope® device is minimally invasive and it allows an anatomic restoration of the joint. It is a safe and effective procedure ensuring stable AC joint reconstruction and good cosmetic results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AC joint separation; acromioclavicular joint dislocation; arthroscopic reconstruction; endobutton system

Year:  2015        PMID: 25767774      PMCID: PMC4327346     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J        ISSN: 2240-4554


  24 in total

1.  A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Stephen A Santangelo; Sean T Johnson; Clifford G Rios; Mark L Dumonski; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

2.  Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury.

Authors:  Emilio Calvo; Mariano López-Franco; Ignacio M Arribas
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Arthroscopically assisted acromioclavicular joint reconstruction.

Authors:  Keith M Baumgarten; David W Altchek; Frank A Cordasco
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Arthroscopic anatomical reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint.

Authors:  Gian M Salzmann; Lars Walz; Philip B Schoettle; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  Muscle, Ligaments and Tendons Journal. Basic principles and recommendations in clinical and field science research.

Authors:  Johnny Padulo; Francesco Oliva; Antonio Frizziero; Nicola Maffulli
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2014-02-24

6.  Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation.

Authors:  J K Weaver; H K Dunn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  All-arthroscopic Weaver-Dunn-Chuinard procedure with double-button fixation for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Pascal Boileau; Jason Old; Olivier Gastaud; Nicolas Brassart; Yannick Roussanne
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2009-12-30       Impact factor: 4.772

8.  [A new minimally invasive arthroscopic technique for reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint].

Authors:  F Elser; B Chernchujit; P Ansah; A B Imhoff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Biomechanical rationale for development of anatomical reconstructions of coracoclavicular ligaments after complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Ryan S Costic; Joanne E Labriola; Mark W Rodosky; Richard E Debski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Incidence of associated injuries with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations types III through V.

Authors:  Thomas Tischer; Gian Max Salzmann; Hosam El-Azab; Stephan Vogt; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-08-25       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  12 in total

1.  Short-term outcomes of arthroscopic TightRope® fixation are better than hook plate fixation in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Authors:  Hamid Rahmatullah Bin Abd Razak; Eng-Meng Nicholas Yeo; William Yeo; Tijauw-Tjoen Denny Lie
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-12-09

2.  The prevalence of intraarticular associated lesions after acute acromioclavicular joint injuries is 20%. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Miguel Santiago Moreno Romero; Jorge Diaz Heredia; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Alfonso Muriel; Jesus López-Alcalde
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  PREFERED SURGICAL TECHNIQUE USED BY ORTHOPEDISTS IN ACUTE ACROMIOCLAVICULAR DISLOCATION.

Authors:  Alexandre Yukio Nishimi; Demetrio Simão Arbex; Diogo Lucas Campos Martins; Carlos Vinicius Buarque DE Gusmão; Roberto Rangel Bongiovanni; Luciano Pascarelli
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.513

5.  The surgical treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries.

Authors:  Michele Boffano; Stefano Mortera; Hazem Wafa; Raimondo Piana
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-10-19

Review 6.  Post-operative outcomes and complications of suspensory loop fixation device versus hook plate in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alisara Arirachakaran; Manusak Boonard; Peerapong Piyapittayanun; Wichan Kanchanatawan; Kornkit Chaijenkij; Akom Prommahachai; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-02-25

7.  A retrospective comparative study of arthroscopic fixation in acute Rockwood type IV acromioclavicular joint dislocation: single versus double paired Endobutton technique.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Haifeng Liu; Wei Lu; Dingfu Li; Weimin Zhu; Kan Ouyang; Bing Wu; Liangquan Peng; Daping Wang
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Acromioclavicular joint injuries: diagnosis, classification and ligamentoplasty procedures.

Authors:  Evrim Sirin; Nuri Aydin; Osman Mert Topkar
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-07-17

9.  A New Coracoclavicular Guider for Minimally Invasive Anatomic Coracoclavicular Reconstruction with Two TightRope Systems in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.

Authors:  Yi Zhao; Lei Tan; Wan Tang; Tiecheng Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The frequency of reduction loss after arthroscopic fixation of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double-button device, and its effect on clinical and radiological results.

Authors:  Engin Çarkçı; Ayşe Esin Polat; Tahsin Gürpınar
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.