Literature DB >> 1858525

Measurement of mechanical properties of bone material in vitro by ultrasound reflection: methodology and comparison with ultrasound transmission.

P P Antich1, J A Anderson, R B Ashman, J E Dowdey, J Gonzales, R C Murry, J E Zerwekh, C Y Pak.   

Abstract

An ultrasound reflection technique was designed and implemented to study the mechanical properties of bone material. The technique uses the fact that an ultrasound beam produced in water undergoes total internal reflection off a bone sample at a critical angle formally related to the velocity of a pressure wave in bone. When the plane of scattering is rotated around the normal to the sample surface, the critical angle varies with a periodic dependence dictated by the intrinsic symmetry of the bone structure at the point being examined. Most current measurements of sound velocity are made using transmission techniques. A double-blind intercomparison between this technique and a transmission technique, which was previously validated against tensile mechanical testing, was performed for samples of isotropic materials and of human cortical bone. Strong correlations were found for both sets of samples. For the isotropic materials the velocities were approximately equal, but for bone they were on average 11% higher in reflection than in transmission. This was the result both of the higher frequency employed in reflection (3.5 rather than 2.25 MHz) and of the different effects of sample imperfections on the two measurements. In particular, the reflection technique used in this work studied the surface of the sample, but the ultrasound beam in the transmission method propagated through its interior. In assessing the mechanical properties of bone specimens by ultrasound, the reflection technique samples a discrete bone surface element and the transmission method analyzes the entire volume of the specimen. Thus the reflection technique may yield a measure of the mechanical property of bone trabeculae that is largely unaffected by the mass of the entire specimen, but mass and the structural density of the specimen affect the transmission method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1858525     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650060414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  13 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Measuring the structural strength of bones with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: principles, technical limitations, and future possibilities.

Authors:  Thomas Beck
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Assessment and classification of mechanical strength components of human femur trabecular bone using texture analysis and neural network.

Authors:  Joseph Jesu Christopher; Swaminathan Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Advances in the noninvasive assessment of bone density, quality, and structure.

Authors:  H K Genant; T F Lang; K Engelke; T Fuerst; C Glüer; S Majumdar; M Jergas
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Reduction in normalized bone elasticity following long-term bisphosphonate treatment as measured by ultrasound critical angle reflectometry.

Authors:  Edmond Richer; Matthew A Lewis; Clarita V Odvina; Miguel A Vazquez; Billy J Smith; Roy D Peterson; John R Poindexter; Peter P Antich; Charles Y C Pak
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Ultrasound study of bone in vitro.

Authors:  P P Antich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Clinical determination of bone quality: is ultrasound an answer?

Authors:  G H Brandenburger
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Broadband ultrasound attenuation signals depend on trabecular orientation: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C C Glüer; C Y Wu; H K Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure.

Authors:  C C Glüer; C Y Wu; M Jergas; S A Goldstein; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Quantitative ultrasound of the heel: correlation with densitometric measurements at different skeletal sites.

Authors:  K G Faulkner; M R McClung; L J Coleman; E Kingston-Sandahl
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.