Literature DB >> 14502071

Clinical uses of electrically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses.

Carolyn J Brown1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize current thinking relative to clinical applications for the electrically evoked compound action potential and the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response with the focus on works published between 1998 and 2003. RECENT
FINDINGS: During the period of this review, a considerable body of research has been published describing how the electrically evoked compound action potential can be measured and how the electrically evoked compound action potential may be used in the clinical treatment of cochlear implant patients. During this same period, there has been a decline in the number of studies reporting potential clinical applications for the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Perhaps the strongest clinical application for the electrically evoked compound action potential today is as a tool to facilitate the process of fitting the speech processor of the cochlear implant. This is particularly important for pediatric patients who may not be able to be programmed using traditional behavioral techniques. The accuracy of these predictions is discussed in addition to the limitations of the studies reviewed.
SUMMARY: The introduction of cochlear implants with the capability of measuring the response of the auditory nerve to electrical stimulation from an intracochlear electrode has tremendous potential to impact clinical practice. Research into how best to use this information is ongoing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14502071     DOI: 10.1097/00020840-200310000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 1068-9508            Impact factor:   2.064


  8 in total

1.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Behavioral Comfort Levels in Cochlear Implantees: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  S Raghunandhan; A Ravikumar; Mohan Kameswaran; Kalyani Mandke; R Ranjith
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-10-16

Review 2.  [Intra- and postoperative electrophysiological diagnostics].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; R Beck; L Jung; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Maps created using a new objective procedure (C-NRT) correlate with behavioral, loudness-balanced maps: a study in adult cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Alessandro Scorpecci; Alessandra D'Elia; Paolo Malerba; Italo Cantore; Patrizia Consolino; Franco Trabalzini; Gaetano Paludetti; Nicola Quaranta
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Trends in cochlear implants.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 5.  Advances in cochlear implant telemetry: evoked neural responses, electrical field imaging, and technical integrity.

Authors:  Lucas H M Mens
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

6.  Programming characteristics of cochlear implants in children: effects of aetiology and age at implantation.

Authors:  Paola V Incerti; Teresa Y C Ching; Sanna Hou; Patricia Van Buynder; Christopher Flynn; Robert Cowan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Longitudinal Analysis of the Absence of Intraoperative Neural Response Telemetry in Children using Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Amanda Christina Gomes de Moura; Maria Valéria Schmidt Goffi-Gomez; Maria Ines Vieira Couto; Rubens Brito; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Debora Maria Befi-Lopes; Carla Gentile Matas; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-07-17

8.  Longitudinal study of the ecap measured in children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Liege Franzini Tanamati; Maria Cecília Bevilacqua; Orozimbo Alves Costa
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.