Literature DB >> 23295726

How well do cochlear implant intraoperative impedance measures predict postoperative electrode function?

Jenny L Goehring1, Michelle L Hughes, Jacquelyn L Baudhuin, Rodney P Lusk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Objectives were as follows: 1) to evaluate the incidence of abnormal cochlear implant electrode impedance intraoperatively and at the initial activation, 2) to identify the percentage of abnormalities that resolve by the initial activation, and 3) to determine the incidence of normal intraoperative impedances that present as abnormal at the initial activation. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective records review of intraoperative and postoperative cochlear implant electrode impedances.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Records were examined for 194 devices implanted in 165 pediatric and adult patients.
RESULTS: Results indicate at least 1 open (OC) or short circuit (SC) in 12.4% (24/194) of devices intraoperatively, decreasing to 8.2% (16/194) postoperatively. OCs were more prevalent than SCs for intraoperative (92% versus 8%) and postoperative (94% versus 6%) intervals. Of the 3,430 total electrodes, 78 had abnormal impedance intraoperatively. Sixty-four of those (82%) resolved by the postoperative interval (62 OC, 2 SC), whereas 18% (14/78) remained abnormal postoperatively (12 OC, 2 SC). Six (0.17%) of 3,430 electrodes had normal impedance intraoperatively but were abnormal postoperatively.
CONCLUSION: The incidence of SCs in the present study is likely underestimated because of poor sensitivity of monopolar coupling for detecting SCs. Intraoperative OCs have a high probability of resolving by the initial activation, particularly when contiguous electrodes are affected and suggests limited need for the use of a backup device in these cases. Surgical technique and/or complications, such as explant/reimplant or perilymphatic gushers, may result in increased incidence of bubbles in the cochlea and may play a role in abnormal intraoperative impedance results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23295726      PMCID: PMC3548045          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827c9d71

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  8 in total

1.  Long-term measures of electrode impedance and auditory thresholds for the Ineraid cochlear implant.

Authors:  M F Dorman; L M Smith; K Dankowski; G McCandless; J L Parkin
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1992-10

2.  Electrophysiologic and objective monitoring of the cochlear implant during surgery: implementation, audit and outcomes.

Authors:  Steve Mason
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Sensitivity and specificity of averaged electrode voltage measures in cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Michelle L Hughes; Carolyn J Brown; Paul J Abbas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Prevalence and timing of individual cochlear implant electrode failures.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; David J Archibald; Tushar S Dabade; Rene H Gifford; Brian A Neff; Charles W Beatty; David M Barrs; Colin L W Driscoll
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Using impedance telemetry to diagnose cochlear electrode history, location, and functionality.

Authors:  J H Schulman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl       Date:  1995-09

6.  A longitudinal study of electrode impedance, the electrically evoked compound action potential, and behavioral measures in nucleus 24 cochlear implant users.

Authors:  M L Hughes; K R Vander Werff; C J Brown; P J Abbas; D M Kelsay; H F Teagle; M W Lowder
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Characteristics of malfunctioning channels in pediatric cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jerry W Lin; Avni Mody; Ross Tonini; Claudia Emery; Jody Haymond; Jeffrey T Vrabec; John S Oghalai
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Retrospective study of intra-operative testing with the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant and use of the back-up device.

Authors:  J Garnham; K P Gibbin; G M O'Donoghue; Y Cope; S M Mason
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2003-03
  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Anatomical Variations, Surgical Difficulties, and Complications Associated with Cochlear Implantation in Different Age Groups of the Pediatric Population of Nepal: A Tertiary Level Hospital-Based Study.

Authors:  Rabindra B Pradhananga; Bigyan R Gyawali; Pabina Rayamajhi; Kripa Dongol; Hari Bhattarai
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-11-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.