Literature DB >> 1446048

Should women with node-negative breast cancer receive adjuvant chemotherapy?--Insights from a decision analysis model.

B E Hillner1, T J Smith.   

Abstract

The use of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer has been controversial and actively debated since the 1988 National Cancer Institute Clinical Alert. We developed a decision analysis model that used the results of available randomized controlled trials to assess the potential clinical and financial effects of using adjuvant chemotherapy for groups of 45-year-old and 60-year-old women. Using the baseline assumptions, we found that chemotherapy increases quality adjusted life expectancy and survival by a substantial amount at a cost comparable to most accepted medical interventions. The model highlights the uncertainties in duration of benefit from therapy, the need for refinements in risk stratification, the importance of patient preferences about toxicity and benefit, and the need for accurate cost-accounting for oncologic therapies. Decision analysis complements other methods for information gathering, analysis, and synthesis used in clinical research. With the increasing focus on the effectiveness of medical interventions, decision analysis will be an important tool for oncologists to understand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1446048     DOI: 10.1007/bf01831472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  28 in total

Review 1.  NIH consensus conference. Treatment of early-stage breast cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  A long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P R Rosen; S Groshen; P E Saigo; D W Kinne; S Hellman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Karnofsky memorial lecture. Conceptual and practical advances in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  G Bonadonna
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  A clinician's guide to cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  A S Detsky; I G Naglie
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Predicting treatment costs and life expectancy for end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  P V Stange; A T Sumner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-02-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Implications of kinetic heterogeneity in clinical oncology.

Authors:  L Norton
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of autologous bone marrow transplantation in metastatic breast cancer. Estimates using decision analysis while awaiting clinical trial results.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-04-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  D M Eddy
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1989-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Long-term cost-effectiveness of various initial monotherapies for mild to moderate hypertension.

Authors:  J T Edelson; M C Weinstein; A N Tosteson; L Williams; T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. A decision-analysis model.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-01-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  J Brown; M Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Medical Economics and Quality of Life: Analysis of Factors That Influence the Perception of Medical Cost by Post-surgical Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1995-10-31       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 3.  Tamoxifen: a review of pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life considerations for its use as adjuvant therapy in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  H M Bryson; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  A new decision model for cost-utility comparisons of chemotherapy in recurrent metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  J Hutton; R Brown; M Borowitz; K Abrams; M Rothman; A Shakespeare
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Assessing the cost effectiveness of adjuvant therapies in early breast cancer using a decision analysis model.

Authors:  B E Hillner; T J Smith; C E Desch
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.