Literature DB >> 10146967

Tamoxifen: a review of pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life considerations for its use as adjuvant therapy in women with breast cancer.

H M Bryson1, G L Plosker.   

Abstract

Extensive clinical experience, summarised in the recent overview of the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG), have confirmed that tamoxifen reduces the rate of both disease recurrence and mortality when administered as adjuvant therapy in women with early breast cancer. Tamoxifen is now established as the preferred adjuvant agent in postmenopausal women; in particular, patients with node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer have the most to gain from tamoxifen therapy. Data from a decision-analysis model indicated that tamoxifen monotherapy had a cost-utility ration {$US6000 per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), in 1989 dollars} 5 to 6 times lower than that cited as the cost-acceptability cut-off point in the US. While tamoxifen monotherapy is effective in postmenopausal women, the EBCTCG overview findings indicate that a combined regimen of tamoxifen and antineoplastic chemotherapy has superior efficacy in the same patient group. An issue of current interest is whether the added benefit offered by such a regimen can be justified in terms of added toxicity and cost. Data from a decision-analysis model indicate that combined therapy has a high incremental cost-utility ratio ($US58 000 per additional QALY, in 1989 dollars) compared with no therapy in postmenopausal women. However, the quality-of-life measures TWiST (Time Without Symptoms and Toxicity) and Q-TWiST (quality-adjusted TWiST) indicate that the early toxicity associated with a combined regimen appears to be justified given the superior long term benefits. Patient preference data from 1 study further indicate that the degree of benefit offered by a combined regimen would be acceptable to the majority (73%) of patients. Other areas where pharmacoeconomic analyses may help define more closely the optimal use of adjuvant tamoxifen is in patients at low risk of developing metastatic disease and in determining the optimal duration of therapy. Both areas require further clinical data. In conclusion, tamoxifen adjuvant monotherapy has a low cost-utility ratio in postmenopausal women with node-positive, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Combined therapy in the same patient group has a high cost-utility ratio compared with no therapy but quality-of-life and patient preference data suggest that the costs may be justified. Firm conclusions relating to the use of the drug in other patient subgroups and the optimal duration of therapy await further research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 10146967     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199304010-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  126 in total

1.  Tamoxifen: disease prevention or disease substitution?

Authors:  A Fugh-Berman; S Epstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer: a cautious interpretation.

Authors:  I C Henderson
Journal:  Important Adv Oncol       Date:  1990

3.  Effect of long term tamoxifen treatment on bone turnover in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  C D Wright; R E Mansell; J C Gazet; J E Compston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-02-13

Review 4.  The pharmacology and clinical uses of tamoxifen.

Authors:  B J Furr; V C Jordan
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 5.  Breast cancer: psychosocial consequences for the patient.

Authors:  J M Wainstock
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.315

Review 6.  Metabolism of steroid-modifying anticancer agents.

Authors:  S P Robinson; V C Jordan
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 7.  Systemic adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  D Tripathy; I C Henderson
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.645

8.  The development of a method for assessing the quality of life of cancer patients.

Authors:  P J Selby; J A Chapman; J Etazadi-Amoli; D Dalley; N F Boyd
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis in women with operable breast cancer treated with adjuvant CMF and tamoxifen.

Authors:  G Delrio; S De Placido; C Pagliarulo; M d'Istria; S Fasano; A Marinelli; F Citarella; L De Sio; A Contegiacomo; R V Iaffaioli
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1986-02-28

10.  Endocrine effects of tamoxifen in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Authors:  F Boccardo; D Guarneri; A Rubagotti; G L Casertelli; G Bentivoglio; N Conte; G Campanella; G Gaggero; G Comelli; S Zanardi
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1984-02-29
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Systemic therapy in breast cancer: efficacy and cost utility.

Authors:  J F Corry; P E Lønning
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Vinorelbine. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical use in cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  K L Goa; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  The value of anticancer drugs - a regulatory view.

Authors:  Francesco Pignatti; Ulla Wilking; Douwe Postmus; Nils Wilking; Julio Delgado; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 4.  Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007.

Authors:  Ali Montazeri
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-08-29
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.