Literature DB >> 1898533

Efficacy and cost effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with node-negative breast cancer. A decision-analysis model.

B E Hillner1, T J Smith.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1988 the National Cancer Institute issued a Clinical Alert that has been widely interpreted as recommending that all women with node-negative breast cancer receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Acceptance of this recommendation is controversial, since many women who would not have a recurrence would be treated.
METHODS: Using a decision-analysis model, we studied the cost effectiveness of chemotherapy in cohorts of 45-year-old and 60-year-old women with node-negative breast cancer by calculating life expectancy as adjusted for quality of life. The analysis evaluated different scenarios of the benefit of therapy: improved disease-free survival for five years, with a lesser effect on overall survival (base line); a lifelong benefit from chemotherapy; and a benefit in disease-free survival with no change in overall survival by year 10. The base-line analysis assumed a 30 percent reduction in the relative risk of recurrence for five years after treatment.
RESULTS: For the 45-year-old woman, the base-line analysis found an average lifetime benefit from chemotherapy of 5.1 quality-months at a cost of $15,400 per quality-year. The 60-year-old women gained 4.0 quality-months at a cost of $18,800 per quality-year. Under the more and less optimistic scenarios, the benefit of chemotherapy varied from 1.4 to 14.0 quality-months for both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy substantially increases the quality-adjusted life expectancy of an average woman at a cost comparable to that of other widely accepted therapies. This benefit decreases markedly if the changes in long-term survival are less than in disease-free survival. Given its uncertain duration, the benefit may be too small for many women to choose chemotherapy. Selective use of chemotherapy to maximize the benefit to individual patients may be possible with refinements in risk stratification and explicit assessment of the patients' risk preferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1898533     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199101173240305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  47 in total

Review 1.  Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.

Authors:  J Brown; M Sculpher
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Selecting a decision model for economic evaluation: a case study and review.

Authors:  J Karnon; J Brown
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  1998-10

Review 3.  Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health.

Authors:  A L Siu; E A McGlynn; H Morgenstern; M H Beers; D M Carlisle; E B Keeler; J Beloff; K Curtin; J Leaning; B C Perry
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Decision analysis in medicine.

Authors:  J G Thornton; R J Lilford; N Johnson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-04-25

5.  Institutional formularies: the relevance of pharmacoeconomic analysis to formulary decisions.

Authors:  R J Lipsy
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Indices of therapeutic outcome in pharmacoeconomic evaluation of drug therapy.

Authors:  S F Hurley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Assessing the real-world cost-effectiveness of adjuvant trastuzumab in HER-2/neu positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Lindsay Hedden; Susan O'Reilly; Caroline Lohrisch; Stephen Chia; Caroline Speers; Laurel Kovacic; Suzanne Taylor; Stuart Peacock
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-02-02

8.  Prognostic factors and natural history in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  R Arriagada; L E Rutqvist; L Skoog; H Johansson; A Kramar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Cost Effectiveness of Exemestane versus Tamoxifen in Post-Menopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer in Germany.

Authors:  Sebastian Braun; Thomas Mittendorf; Thomas Menschik; Wolfgang Greiner; Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Radiofrequency ablation plus nucleotide analogous for hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Baoxian Liu; Mengchao Wei; Furong Liu; Shuling Chen; Zhenwei Peng; Bin Li; Qian Zhou; Haibo Wang; Sui Peng; Ming Kuang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 4.060

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.