Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Likelihood ratios for DNA identification.

Literature DB >> 8016106

Likelihood ratios for DNA identification.

Abstract

Likelihood ratio (LR) tests are provided for the three alternatives to DNA identity: exclusion, coincidence, and kinship. The coincidence test uses the radius of coalescence to conserve the observed frequency of single band phenotypes. Genotype probabilities under kinship are derived for mating groups, specified relatives, and structured populations; and unbiased estimates of the genetic parameters are provided. The LR is made robust to gene frequency errors by specifying the mean matching probability, and the tolerable loss of information this entails is determined by LR theory. This straightforward application of the seminal work of Jerzy Neyman and Sewall Wright strongly supports the use of LRs and kinship for presentation of DNA evidence by expert witnesses and committees.

Mesh：

Substances：
Genetic Markers
DNA

Year: 1994 PMID： 8016106 PMCID： PMC44126 DOI： 10.1073/pnas.91.13.6007

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN： 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205

24 in total

1. Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations.

Authors: D E Krane; R W Allen; S A Sawyer; D A Petrov; D L Hartl
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-11-15 Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2. Population genetics in the forensic DNA debate.

Authors: B S Weir
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1992-12-15 Impact factor: 11.205

3. Systems of Mating. V. General Considerations.

Authors: S Wright
Journal: Genetics Date: 1921-03 Impact factor: 4.562

4. Research on DNA typing catching up with courtroom application.

Authors: E S Lander
Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1991-05 Impact factor: 11.025

5. The affected sib-pair method using identity by state relations.

Authors: K Lange
Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1986-07 Impact factor: 11.025

6. Kinship bioassay on hypervariable loci in blacks and Caucasians.

Authors: N E Morton; A Collins; I Balazs
Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1993-03-01 Impact factor: 11.205

7. Statistical evaluation of DNA fingerprinting: a critique of the NRC's report.

Authors: B Devlin; N Risch; K Roeder
Journal: Science Date: 1993-02-05 Impact factor: 47.728

8. Statistical power of an exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportions of genotypic data at a multiallelic locus.

Authors: R Chakraborty; Y Zhong
Journal: Hum Hered Date: 1994 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 0.444

9. The efficiency of multilocus DNA fingerprint probes for individualization and establishment of family relationships, determined from extensive casework.

Authors: A J Jeffreys; M Turner; P Debenham
Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1991-05 Impact factor: 11.025

Likelihood ratios for DNA identification.

1. Genetic differences at four DNA typing loci in Finnish, Italian, and mixed Caucasian populations.

Review 2. Population genetics in the forensic DNA debate.

3. Systems of Mating. V. General Considerations.

4. Research on DNA typing catching up with courtroom application.

5. The affected sib-pair method using identity by state relations.

6. Kinship bioassay on hypervariable loci in blacks and Caucasians.

7. Statistical evaluation of DNA fingerprinting: a critique of the NRC's report.

8. Statistical power of an exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportions of genotypic data at a multiallelic locus.

9. The efficiency of multilocus DNA fingerprint probes for individualization and establishment of family relationships, determined from extensive casework.

10. Human population genetic studies of five hypervariable DNA loci.

1. Mild detritylation of nucleic acid hydroxyl groups by warming up.

2. DNA identification.

3. Alternative approaches to population structure.

4. DNA profile match probabilities in a subdivided population: when can subdivision be ignored?

5. Inferring identify from DNA profile evidence.

6. Bayes and the Law.

7. Likelihood Ratios for Deep Neural Networks in Face Comparison.