Literature DB >> 22110796

Complications of rigid internal fixation.

Chris A Campbell1, Kant Y Lin.   

Abstract

Over the past 20 years, there have been many advances in the development of bone fixation systems used in the practice of craniomaxillofacial surgery. As surgical practices have evolved, the complications of each technologic advance have changed accordingly. Interfragmentary instability of interosseous wiring has been replaced by the risk of exposure, infection, and palpability of plate and screw fixation systems. The improved rigidity of plate fixation requires anatomic alignment of fracture fragments. Failure to obtain proper alignment has led to the phenomenon known as "open internal fixation" of fracture fragments without proper reduction. The size of the plates has decreased to minimize palpability and exposure. However limitations in their application have been encountered due to the physiologic forces of the muscles of mastication and bone healing. In the pediatric population, the long-standing presence of plates in the cranial vault resulted in reports of transcranial migration and growth restriction. These findings led to the development of resorbable plating systems, which are associated with self-limited plate palpability and soft tissue inflammatory reactions. Any rigid system including these produces growth restriction in varying amounts. In this discussion, we review the reported complication rates of miniplating and microplating systems as well as absorptive plating systems in elective and traumatic craniofacial surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Rigid internal fixation; complications; craniofacial; craniomaxillofacial trauma; facial fracture

Year:  2009        PMID: 22110796      PMCID: PMC3052647          DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1202596

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  37 in total

1.  Structural pillars of the facial skeleton: an approach to the management of Le Fort fractures.

Authors:  P N Manson; J E Hoopes; C T Su
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  Internal fixation vs. conventional therapy in midface fractures.

Authors:  D W Klotch; R Gilliland
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1987-10

3.  The effect of rigid internal fixation on cranial growth.

Authors:  J I Resnick; B M Kinney; H K Kawamoto
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Use of resorbable plates and screws in pediatric facial fractures.

Authors:  Barry L Eppley
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.895

5.  Modern surgical treatment of complex facial fractures: a 6-year review.

Authors:  Jason M Jack; Daniel H Stewart; Brian D Rinker; Henry C Vasconez; Lee L Q Pu
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.046

6.  The fate of plates and screws after facial fracture reconstruction.

Authors:  T J Francel; B C Birely; P R Ringelman; P N Manson
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Comparative postoperative infection rates in midfacial trauma using intermaxillary fixation, wire fixation, and rigid internal fixation implants.

Authors:  J D Macias; J Haller; J L Frodel
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1993-03

8.  Resorbable PLLA-PGA plate and screw fixation in pediatric craniofacial surgery: clinical experience in 1883 patients.

Authors:  Barry L Eppley; Louis Morales; Robert Wood; Jay Pensler; Jeff Goldstein; Robert J Havlik; Mutaz Habal; Albert Losken; J Kerwin Williams; Fernando Burstein; Arlene A Rozzelle; A Michael Sadove
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Role of mini- and microplate fixation in fractures of the midface and mandible.

Authors:  G R Evans; N Clark; P N Manson; L S Leipziger
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 1.539

10.  Comparison of rigid plate versus wire fixation in the management of zygoma fractures: a long-term follow-up clinical study.

Authors:  R J Rohrich; D Watumull
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  6 in total

1.  Treatment of Infected Facial Implants.

Authors:  Kriti Mohan; Joshua A Cox; Ryan M Dickey; Paula Gravina; Anthony Echo; Shayan A Izaddoost; Anh H Nguyen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  Comparative Assessment of Microplates with Miniplates in the Fixation of Midface Fractures: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Tanvy Sansgiri; Kavitha Prasad; Vineeth Kumar; K Ranganath; B R Rajanikanth; K M Sejal; Parimala Sagar; G Prathibha
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-10-01

3.  An isogenic model of murine mandibular distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Sagar S Deshpande; Daniela M Weiss; Alexis Donneys; Katherine K Gallagher; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Deniz Sarhaddi; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.046

Review 4.  Trauma of the midface.

Authors:  Thomas S Kühnel; Torsten E Reichert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

5.  An antibacterial and absorbable silk-based fixation material with impressive mechanical properties and biocompatibility.

Authors:  Chenglong Shi; Xiaobing Pu; Guan Zheng; Xinglong Feng; Xuan Yang; Baoliang Zhang; Yu Zhang; Qingshui Yin; Hong Xia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Conductive Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: Current State and Future Outlook.

Authors:  Damion T Dixon; Cheryl T Gomillion
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2021-12-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.