Literature DB >> 1402942

The fate of massive allografts in total hip acetabular revision surgery.

F H Pollock1, L A Whiteside.   

Abstract

A series of 23 major load-bearing acetabular allografts done in conjunction with revision total hip arthroplasty were prospectively evaluated. This study includes cases with a minimum 2-year follow-up period. The procedures were performed using noncemented porous-coated acetabular components with pegs. In seven acetabula there was no change in cup position when compared with the initial postoperative roentgenogram (35%). Six acetabula migrated 3-5 mm during the first 2 years, then became stable without further progression (28.6%). In six cases (30%) gross loosening and migration occurred, requiring revision to a larger cup. One case required exchange arthroplasty for infection (5%). All biopsies taken at the time of the revision for failure showed viable bone replacing allograft. If the criteria for success of major superior acetabular allografts include incorporation of the graft and long-term stability of the implant, then the success rate in this series is very low. Only 7 of 20 hips were successful over a relatively short time period. However, if expectations are lowered, and the procedure is considered successful if adequate bone stock is restored to the acetabulum to allow reconstruction with a cementless cup firmly fixed in viable bone, then all but three revisions were successful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1402942     DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(92)90048-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  14 in total

1.  [Mega cups and partial pelvic replacement].

Authors:  R von Eisenhart-Rothe; H Gollwitzer; A Toepfer; H Pilge; B M Holzapfel; H Rechl; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Michael E Higgins; Joseph Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Acetabular reconstruction with the Kerboull-type plate at mid-term follow-up: survivorship analysis and prognostic factors for loosening.

Authors:  Tomomi Kamada; Hiroshi Imai; Naohiko Mahima; Jun Takeba; Joji Miyawaki; Hiromasa Miura
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-12

5.  Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.

Authors:  Nienke van Egmond; Daniel C J De Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?

Authors:  Erik Hansen; David Shearer; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Acetabular Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Won Yong Shon; Siva Swaminathan Santhanam; Jung Woo Choi
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-03-31

8.  Acetabular revision using a total acetabular allograft.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Vijay Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Trabecular metal acetabular revision system (cup-cage construct) to address the massive acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Ramprasad Kancherla; Vijay Kumar; Aditya Soral
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Acetabular reconstruction with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage and bulk allografts: minimum 10-year follow-up results.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Ingrid Bonetti
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.