Literature DB >> 29026992

Acetabular reconstruction with the Kerboull-type plate at mid-term follow-up: survivorship analysis and prognostic factors for loosening.

Tomomi Kamada1, Hiroshi Imai2, Naohiko Mahima2, Jun Takeba2, Joji Miyawaki2, Hiromasa Miura2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Successful reconstruction during total hip arthroplasty for acetabular bone defects remains challenging. The purpose of our study was to evaluate clinical and radiographic results and performed a survivorship analysis for patients with acetabular bone loss undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) or revision THA using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device(KT plate). Additionally, some independent prognostic factors for radiographic failure were identified.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Thirty patients (36 hips) were available for follow-up examination between 1997 and 2012, with a mean follow-up period of 10 years. We evaluated clinical and radiographic results. The mean patient age at the time of the operation was 66 years.
RESULTS: Failure occurred in 6 cases, and further revisions were required for 2 hips. With failure for any reason as an endpoint, the cumulative survival at 10 years was 85%. Survival analysis at 10 years with failure as the endpoint revealed that the inclination angle of the KT plate ≤ 45° group showed higher survivorship than the inclination angle > 45° group (95.8 vs. 63.6%, P = 0.0047).
CONCLUSIONS: With a mean follow-up of 10 years, the clinical and radiographic outcomes were satisfactory. While this study group was small, the results suggest that prosthesis longevity may be improved by setting the inclination angle of this reinforcement device at ≤ 45°.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular reconstruction; Kerboull-type cross-plate; Survivorship analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29026992     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2060-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  23 in total

1.  The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula.

Authors:  J Rosson; J Schatzker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-09

2.  Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device: 35 hips followed for 3-7 years.

Authors:  John V Lunn; Stephen S Kearns; William Quinlan; Paraic Murray; John O Byrne
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Revision total hip replacement using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device with morsellised or bulk graft: results at a mean follow-up of 8.7 years.

Authors:  K Kawanabe; H Akiyama; E Onishi; T Nakamura
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2007-01

4.  Revision with impacted bone allografts and the Kerboull cross plate for massive bone defect of the acetabulum.

Authors:  Kunihiko Okano; Noriaki Miyata; Hiroshi Enomoto; Makoto Osaki; Hiroyuki Shindo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The use of structural periacetabular allografts in acetabular revision surgery: 2.5-5 years follow-up.

Authors:  S Schelfaut; S Cool; M Mulier
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum five-year follow-up.

Authors:  D Garbuz; E Morsi; A E Gross
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis.

Authors:  H Akiyama; K Yamamoto; M Tsukanaka; K Kawanabe; H Otsuka; K So; K Goto; T Nakamura
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-09

8.  Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ariane Gerber; Markus Pisan; David Zurakowski; Balz Isler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device for rapidly destructive coxarthrosis.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Kawai; Chiaki Tanaka; Minoru Ikenaga; Hiroshi Kanoe; Shuzo Okudaira
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  2 in total

1.  Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices-case-control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Masumoto; Shigeo Fukunishi; Tomokazu Fukui; Yu Takeda; Shoji Nishio; Yuki Fujihara; Shohei Okahisa; Taishi Okada; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  The outcomes of total hip arthroplasty in rapidly progressive osteoarthritis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kwaku Baryeh; Vipin Asopa; Richard Field; David H Sochart
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-09-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.