Literature DB >> 1401516

Effects of short-term auditory deprivation on speech production in adult cochlear implant users.

M A Svirsky1, H Lane, J S Perkell, J Wozniak.   

Abstract

Speech production parameters of three postlingually deafened adults who use cochlear implants were measured: after 24 h of auditory deprivation (which was achieved by turning the subject's speech processor off); after turning the speech processor back on; and after turning the speech processor off again. The measured parameters included vowel acoustics [F1, F2, F0, sound-pressure level (SPL), duration and H1-H2, the amplitude difference between the first two spectral harmonics, a correlate of breathiness] while reading word lists, and average airflow during the reading of passages. Changes in speech processor state (on-to-off or vice versa) were accompanied by numerous changes in speech production parameters. Many changes were in the direction of normalcy, and most were consistent with long-term speech production changes in the same subjects following activation of the processors of their cochlear implants [Perkell et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 2961-2978 (1992)]. Changes in mean airflow were always accompanied by H1-H2 (breathiness) changes in the same direction, probably due to underlying changes in laryngeal posture. Some parameters (different combinations of SPL, F0, H1-H2 and formants for different subjects) showed very rapid changes when turning the speech processor on or off. Parameter changes were faster and more pronounced, however, when the speech processor was turned on than when it was turned off. The picture that emerges from the present study is consistent with a dual role for auditory feedback in speech production: long-term calibration of articulatory parameters as well as feedback mechanisms with relatively short time constants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1401516     DOI: 10.1121/1.403923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Interactions between auditory and somatosensory feedback for voice F0 control.

Authors:  Charles R Larson; Kenneth W Altman; Hanjun Liu; Timothy C Hain
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Attenuation of vocal responses to pitch perturbations during Mandarin speech.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Yi Xu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Evidence that the Lombard effect is frequency-specific in humans.

Authors:  Lauren M Stowe; Edward J Golob
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Modeling the Role of Sensory Feedback in Speech Motor Control and Learning.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; John Houde
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: A naturalistic study.

Authors:  Jaewook Lee; Hussnain Ali; Ali Ziaei; Emily A Tobey; John H L Hansen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch.

Authors:  Mario A Svirsky; Thomas M Talavage; Shivank Sinha; Heidi Neuburger; Mahan Azadpour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Audio-vocal system regulation in children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Nicole Russo; Charles Larson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Language structures used by kindergartners with cochlear implants: relationship to phonological awareness, lexical knowledge and hearing loss.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Emily Sansom; Keri Low; Caitlin Rice; Amanda Caldwell-Tarr
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Sensorimotor control of vocal pitch and formant frequencies in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Fatemeh Mollaei; Douglas M Shiller; Shari R Baum; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.