Literature DB >> 16811775

Discriminative effects of massed extincttion.

M Yarczower.   

Abstract

Prior studies have reported that generalization gradients are not steepened if periods of non-reinforcement in S- follow and are not interspersed with periods of reinforcement in S+. Sharper gradients are produced by this massed-extinction procedure if it is preceded by prior discriminative training on a dimension orthogonal to the S+, S- dimension. The present study, using pigeons, found that generalization gradients along the wavelength dimension were steepened by massed-extinction sessions in 570 nm that had been preceded by: (1) discriminative training in which the S+ was a 550-nm light and the S- was a black vertical line superimposed on the 550-nm light; (2) non-differential reinforcement training with a 550-nm light and a black vertical line superimposed on the 550-nm light; (3) reinforcement training with only the 550-nm light. Massed-extinction sessions were administered until the response rate in the presence of the 570-nm stimulus was one-tenth of the mean response rate in the presence of the 550-nm stimulus during prior reinforcement training. Prior studies have used a time-dependent criterion, rather than a response-rate criterion of extinction, and this difference may be responsible for the differences in the effects of massed extinction on stimulus control.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811775      PMCID: PMC1333254          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  WAVELENGTH GENERALIZATION AFTER DISCRIMINATION LEARNING WITH AND WITHOUT ERRORS.

Authors:  H S TERRACE
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Generalization gradients of inhibition following auditory discrimination learning.

Authors:  H M JENKINS; R H HARRISON
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A further study of stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.

Authors:  D R THOMAS; J L WILLIAMS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Stimulus generalization following three-stimulus discrimination training.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-04

5.  Discrimination training effect on stimulus generalization gradient for spectrum stimuli.

Authors:  H M HANSON
Journal:  Science       Date:  1957-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Perceptual differentiation in the course of nondifferential reinforcement.

Authors:  M E BITTERMAN; A D CALVIN; C B ELAM
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-10

7.  The effect of the blackout method on acquisition and generalization.

Authors:  D G Wildemann; J G Holland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Effects of monochromatic rearing on spectral discrimination learning and the peak shift in chicks.

Authors:  R L Rudolph; W K Honig
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Some effects of discriminative training with equated frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  M Yarczower; L R Gollub; J F Dickson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  A device for rapid presentation of monochromatic stimuli.

Authors:  D F Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Peak shift following simultaneous discriminations.

Authors:  A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.