Literature DB >> 10137588

Lack of knowledge in health professionals: a barrier to providing information to patients?

D K Smith1, J Slack, R W Shaw, T M Marteau.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetricians' and midwives' knowledge of routine prenatal screening tests for fetal abnormality and factors associated with such knowledge.
DESIGN: Questionnaire assessment of antenatal clinic staff.
SETTING: Six hospitals within the United Kingdom (four district general hospitals in London, one district general hospital in Wales, and one teaching hospital in Wales), offering routine prenatal screening tests.
SUBJECTS: 29 obstetricians and 97 midwives were invited to participate, of whom 21 and 70 respectively responded to the questionnaire. MAIN MEASURES: Knowledge of prenatal tests, according to 19 item multiple choice questionnaire, reluctance to disclose uncertainty, and clinical experience.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 72% (91/126). In all, 43% of midwives and 14% of obstetricians obtained correct responses on fewer than half the items. Reluctance to disclose uncertainty to patients was associated in obstetricians with having less knowledge about prenatal testing (r = -0.50; p < 0.025, Pearson product moment correlation) and in midwives with more clinical experience (r = 0.43; p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Lack of knowledge and greater clinical experience seem to be important barriers to providing patients with information about prenatal screening tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 10137588      PMCID: PMC1055200          DOI: 10.1136/qshc.3.2.75

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Care        ISSN: 0963-8172


  3 in total

Review 1.  Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement.

Authors:  M Simpson; R Buckman; M Stewart; P Maguire; M Lipkin; D Novack; J Till
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-30

2.  Physicians' reactions to uncertainty in patient care. A new measure and new insights.

Authors:  M S Gerrity; R F DeVellis; J A Earp
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: practice observed.

Authors:  T M Marteau; J Slack; J Kidd; R W Shaw
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.427

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  A measure of informed choice.

Authors:  T M Marteau; E Dormandy; S Michie
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Knowing the knowledge.

Authors:  I C McManus
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1994-06

3.  Talking about disability in prenatal genetic counseling: a report of two interactive workshops.

Authors:  Jan Hodgson; Jon Weil
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Does labeling prenatal screening test results as negative or positive affect a woman's responses?

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Angela Fagerlin; Kristie Keeton; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-09-19       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of human cytomegalovirus infection in the mother, fetus, and newborn infant.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Revello; Giuseppe Gerna
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Pregnant Hispanic women's views and knowledge of prenatal genetic testing.

Authors:  Robin L Page; Christina Murphey; Yahyahan Aras; Lei-Shih Chen; Ryan Loftin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Factors Affecting Improved Prenatal Screening: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Zohreh Shahhosseini; Hoda Arabi; Azam Salehi; Zeinab Hamzehgardeshi
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2015-09-28
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.