Literature DB >> 1376304

Polymeric microballoons as ultrasound contrast agents. Physical and ultrasonic properties compared with sonicated albumin.

M Schneider1, P Bussat, M B Barrau, M Arditi, F Yan, E Hybl.   

Abstract

Air-filled polymeric microballoons were prepared with number-mean diameters of approximately 3 microns, volume-mean diameters of approximately 5 microns, and narrow particle-size distributions (standard deviation [SD] = 1.2 microns in number and SD = 2.0 microns in volume). More than 99% of the particles were below 8 microns. These particles were found to be highly echogenic for ultrasound, showing backscatter coefficients at 7.5 MHz, similar to the ones obtained with sonicated albumin microspheres. However, at 2.25 MHz, microballoons were less echogenic than albumin microspheres. These results are consistent with ultrasound attenuation measurements, which showed a maximum at 8 to 9 MHz for the microballoons compared with a reported value of 3.5 to 4.5 MHz for albumin microbubbles. Polymeric microballoons were found to be stable in plasma or under applied pressure as evidenced by unchanged particle concentration and echogenicity. Albumin microspheres were particularly unstable to applied pressure (150 mm Hg) and showed a rapid decrease in both particle counts and echogenicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1376304     DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199202000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Radiol        ISSN: 0020-9996            Impact factor:   6.016


  9 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Investigating the effect of polymeric approaches on circulation time and physical properties of nanobubbles.

Authors:  Lisa C du Toit; Thirumala Govender; Viness Pillay; Yahya E Choonara; Tetsuya Kodama
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 4.200

6.  Sonicated X-ray contrast agents for quantitative myocardial contrast echocardiography--a critical approach.

Authors:  I V Mayer; M P Lazarov; U Utzinger; A U Freiburghaus; O M Hess
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Coaxial electrospray of microparticles and nanoparticles for biomedical applications.

Authors:  Leilei Zhang; Jiwei Huang; Ting Si; Ronald X Xu
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.166

8.  Evaluation of stability and size distribution of sunflower oil-coated micro bubbles for localized drug delivery.

Authors:  Walter Duarte de Araujo Filho; Fábio Kurt Schneider; Rigoberto E M Morales
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Microfluidic preparation of polymer nanospheres.

Authors:  Israfil Kucuk; Mohan Edirisinghe
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.253

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.