Literature DB >> 1374704

Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space.

K Alho1, D L Woods, A Algazi, R Näätänen.   

Abstract

The effect of processing load on event-related brain potentials (ERPs) was investigated in an intermodal selective attention task in which subjects attended selectively to auditory or visual stimuli. Processing load was manipulated by requiring subjects to detect either difficult-to-detect (deviant) or easy-to-detect (DEVIANT) targets in separate blocks of trials. Attention to auditory stimuli was associated with negative (Nda, 90-170 msec) and positive (Pda, 190-270 msec) enhancements in the ERPs to auditory stimuli. The Nda increased in amplitude with increasing processing load. Deviant auditory stimuli occurring among auditory standard stimuli elicited frontally distributed mismatch negativities (MMNs). The MMN persisted during visual attention and was unaffected by visual processing load. However, the MMN to deviants but not DEVIANTS was enhanced in amplitude with auditory attention. Attention to visual stimuli resulted in positive (Pdv, latency 70-130 msec) and negative (Ndv, 170-270 msec) modulations of visual ERPs, that increased with increasing processing load. Prominent visual deviance-related negativities were observed at occipital and infero-temporal scalp sites (latencies 90-290 msec), but only to DEVIANT visual stimuli. The early MMN-like portion of the visual deviance-related negativity was independent of attention, with equal amplitudes during different auditory and visual conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1374704     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(92)90005-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  47 in total

1.  Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry in the neural representation of speech sounds.

Authors:  T J Bellis; T Nicol; N Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Preattentive auditory context effects.

Authors:  István Winkler; Elyse Sussman; Mari Tervaniemi; János Horváth; Walter Ritter; Risto Näätänen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Pitch discrimination accuracy in musicians vs nonmusicians: an event-related potential and behavioral study.

Authors:  Mari Tervaniemi; Viola Just; Stefan Koelsch; Andreas Widmann; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Modulation of auditory cortex activation by sound presentation rate and attention.

Authors:  Teemu Rinne; Johanna Pekkola; Alexander Degerman; Taina Autti; Iiro P Jääskeläinen; Mikko Sams; Kimmo Alho
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: I. cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson; Seppo P Ahlfors; Clifford D Saron
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Biasing the brain's attentional set: II. effects of selective intersensory attentional deployments on subsequent sensory processing.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Gregory V Simpson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain; Yu He
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 8.  Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: a review.

Authors:  Jonathan R Folstein; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Bi-directional modulation of somatosensory mismatch negativity with transcranial direct current stimulation: an event related potential study.

Authors:  Jui-Cheng Chen; Dorothea Hämmerer; Kevin D'Ostilio; Elias P Casula; Louise Marshall; Chon-Haw Tsai; John C Rothwell; Mark J Edwards
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Demand and modality of directed attention modulate "pre-attentive" sensory processes in schizophrenia patients and nonpsychiatric controls.

Authors:  Anthony J Rissling; Sung-Hyouk Park; Jared W Young; Michelle B Rissling; Catherine A Sugar; Joyce Sprock; Daniel J Mathias; Marlena Pela; Richard F Sharp; David L Braff; Gregory A Light
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.