Literature DB >> 16396093

Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis.

Benjamin J Dyson1, Claude Alain, Yu He.   

Abstract

The sharing of processing resources between the senses was investigated by examining the effects of visual task load on auditory event-related brain potentials (ERPs). In Experiment 1, participants completed both a zero-back and a one-back visual task while a tone pattern or a harmonic series was presented. N1 and P2 waves were modulated by visual task difficulty, but neither mismatch negativity (MMN) elicited by deviant stimuli from the tone pattern nor object-related negativity (ORN) elicited by mistuning from the harmonic series was affected. In Experiment 2, participants responded to identity (what) or location (where) in vision, while ignoring sounds alternating in either pitch (what) or location (where). Auditory ERP modulations were consistent with task difficulty, rather than with task specificity. In Experiment 3, we investigated auditory ERP generation under conditions of no visual task. The results are discussed with respect to a distinction between process-general (N1 and P2) and process-specific (MMN and ORN) auditory ERPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16396093     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.5.3.319

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  48 in total

1.  The correction of ocular artifacts: a topographic perspective.

Authors:  T W Picton; P van Roon; M L Armilio; P Berg; N Ille; M Scherg
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Pitch variation is unnecessary (and sometimes insufficient) for the formation of auditory objects.

Authors:  John G Neuhoff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-04

3.  The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load.

Authors:  Donald J Tellinghuisen; Erin J Nowak
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2003-07

4.  Variable cerebral responses to equally distinct deviance in four auditory dimensions: a mismatch negativity study.

Authors:  L Y Deouell; S Bentin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities.

Authors:  J Duncan; S Martens; R Ward
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Fast preattentive processing of location: a functional basis for selective listening in humans.

Authors:  E Schröger; C Wolff
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1997-08-22       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Global and local precedence: selective attention in form and motion perception.

Authors:  J R Pomerantz
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1983-12

9.  "What" and "where" in the human auditory system.

Authors:  C Alain; S R Arnott; S Hevenor; S Graham; C L Grady
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-09-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Neural activity associated with distinguishing concurrent auditory objects.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Benjamin M Schuler; Kelly L McDonald
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  24 in total

1.  Neural time course of visually enhanced echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm.

Authors:  Brendan Z Allison; John Polich
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2007-11-04       Impact factor: 3.251

4.  Perceptual load affects exogenous spatial orienting while working memory load does not.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Paola Finoia; Antonino Raffone; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Attention to memory: orienting attention to sound object representations.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-20

6.  Attention is critical for spatial auditory object formation.

Authors:  Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  It all sounds the same to me: sequential ERP and behavioral effects during pitch and harmonicity judgments.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Rachel Keen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  N2ac: an ERP component associated with the focusing of attention within an auditory scene.

Authors:  Marissa L Gamble; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Neurophysiological indices of attention to speech in children with specific language impairment.

Authors:  Valerie L Shafer; Curtis Ponton; Hia Datta; Mara L Morr; Richard G Schwartz
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 3.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.