Literature DB >> 13680105

The effect of two nonresorbable suture types on the mechanical performance over a metal suture anchor eyelet.

D Acton1, A Perry, R Evans, A Butler, P Stephens, W Bruce, J Goldberg, D Sonnabend, W R Walsh.   

Abstract

An understanding of the mechanical properties of different suture materials is valuable when selecting the most appropriate suture and repair technique. Sutures should be strong, easy to handle and have high knot security. The introduction of suture anchors adds an additional variable regarding the effect of stress risers over the eyelet. Improving the mechanical properties of a suture may be a possible method to help avoid failure over stress risers such as the eyelet of suture anchor. This study examined the static and viscoelastic properties of a new polyethylene based non-resorbable suture (Fibrewire) over the eyelet of a standard anchor compared to braid polyester non-resorbable suture (Ethibond). Fibrewire had superior ultimate load properties compared to Ethibond (360.2 N+/-23.8 vs 191.9 N+/-17.3) as well as greater stiffness (61.3 N/mm+/-9.7 vs 8.1 N/mm+/-0.4) when tested in uniaxial tension through a metal anchor eyelet (Mitek) ( p<0.001). Fibrewire demonstrated greater stress relaxation than Ethibond ( p<0.05). Differences in the static and viscoelastic properties of suture may have implications in the post-operative period or during rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 13680105     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-003-0399-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  13 in total

1.  Suture anchors--update 1999.

Authors:  F A Barber; M A Herbert
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Fatigue testing of suture anchors.

Authors:  Stefan Rupp; Thomas Georg; Christian Gauss; Dieter Kohn; Romain Seil
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  The effect of suture anchor design and orientation on suture abrasion: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Davide D Bardana; Robert T Burks; John R West; Patrick E Greis
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Failure of suture material at suture anchor eyelets.

Authors:  Dominik C Meyer; Richard W Nyffeler; Sandro F Fucentese; Christian Gerber
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: An in vivo and ex vivo investigation.

Authors:  Craig A Cummins; Sabrina Strickland; Richard C Appleyard; Zoltan L Szomor; Jeanette Marshall; George A C Murrell
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Tensile properties of suture materials.

Authors:  J A von Fraunhofer; R J Storey; B J Masterson
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Tensile strength and knot security of surgical suture materials.

Authors:  J B Herrmann
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 0.688

8.  Pull-out strength of five suture anchors.

Authors:  J E Carpenter; D N Fish; L J Huston; S A Goldstein
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Pull-out strength of suture anchors for rotator cuff and Bankart lesion repairs.

Authors:  A T Hecker; M Shea; J O Hayhurst; E R Myers; L W Meeks; W C Hayes
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Mechanical properties of suture materials: an important characterization.

Authors:  C C Chu
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  1 in total

1.  Low Concentration of Sodium Butyrate from Ultrabraid+NaBu suture, Promotes Angiogenesis and Tissue Remodelling in Tendon-bones Injury.

Authors:  Donghui Liu; Silvia Passos Andrade; Pollyana Ribeiro Castro; John Treacy; Jason Ashworth; Mark Slevin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.