Literature DB >> 10524819

Suture anchors--update 1999.

F A Barber1, M A Herbert.   

Abstract

New suture anchors continue to become available. Our prior reports on the pullout strength of over 50 different anchors is supplemented by a similar test conducted on 25 additional new anchors. This anchor comparison, using an established protocol in fresh porcine femurs, recorded failure strength, failure mode (anchor pullout, suture eyelet cutout, or wire breakage), eyelet size, minor and major diameters, and drill hole sizes. These new anchors were tested in diaphyseal cortex, metaphyseal cortex, and a cancellous trough. Tensile stress parallel to the axis of insertion was applied at a rate of 12.5 mm/sec by an Instron 1321 until failure and mean anchor failure strengths were calculated. Anchors tested included DePuy 4.5 prototypes D1, D2 Catera 4.5, and D3; DePuy 3.5 prototypes D4- Catera 3.5, D5, and D6; Mainstay 2.7, 3.5, 4.5; ROC EZ 2.8, EZ 3.5, and XS 3.5; Ultrafix RC and Ultrafix MiniMite; 1.3 MicroMitek, Panalok 3.5, and Tacit 2.0; Umbrella Harpoon; PeBA 2.8, 4.0, 6.5; and Stryker 1.9, 2.7, 3.4, and 4.5 prototypes. Screw anchors still tend to have higher values, but for the newer nonscrew designs this distinction is less apparent. The new biodegradable anchors were all composed of poly L-lactic acid suggesting a trend away from other polymers, and these new biodegradable anchors showed load-to-failure strengths comparable to others in their class. All anchors were stronger than the suture for which they are designed to accommodate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10524819     DOI: 10.1016/s0749-8063(99)70003-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  7 in total

1.  The effect of two nonresorbable suture types on the mechanical performance over a metal suture anchor eyelet.

Authors:  D Acton; A Perry; R Evans; A Butler; P Stephens; W Bruce; J Goldberg; D Sonnabend; W R Walsh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The effect of the trabecular microstructure on the pullout strength of suture anchors.

Authors:  Christopher M Yakacki; Mariya Poukalova; Robert E Guldberg; Angela Lin; Minn Saing; Scott Gillogly; Ken Gall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Pullout strength of suture anchors: effect of mechanical properties of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Mariya Poukalova; Christopher M Yakacki; Robert E Guldberg; Angela Lin; Minn Saing; Scott D Gillogly; Ken Gall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  History of rotator cuff surgery.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Davide Cucchi; Vincenza Ragone; Laura de Girolamo; Paolo Cabitza; Mario Randelli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Fixation methods and implants in shoulder stabilization: A historical perspective.

Authors:  Jonathan D Kramer; Sean Robinson; Eric Hohn; Connor Purviance; Eugene M Wolf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-05-07

6.  In vivo microstructural analysis of the humeral greater tuberosity in patients with rotator cuff tears using multidetector row computed tomography.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Sakamoto; Akira Kido; Kazuya Inoue; Goro Sakurai; Tomohisa Hashiuchi; Mitsuru Munemoto; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Optimal Lateral Row Anchor Positioning in Posterior-Superior Transosseous Equivalent Rotator Cuff Repair: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Sumit Raniga; Agatha Labrinidis; Kevin Eng; Gregory I Bain; Beat K Moor
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-11-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.