Literature DB >> 11144780

Paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation in the physician-patient relationship. Attitudes among Norwegian physicians.

E Falkum1, R Førde.   

Abstract

Sixteen statements on physician attitudes in the physician-patient relationship were presented to a representative sample of Norwegian physicians (N=990). Three moderately correlated theoretical dimensions were identified in a principal component analysis: paternalism, patient autonomy, and moral deliberation. The paternalism scores increased significantly with age, and psychiatrists scored significantly lower than physicians in somatic specialties. Psychiatrists had the highest scores on the patient autonomy dimension, whereas surgeons scored the lowest. Moral deliberation scores increased slightly with age. To explore the pattern of scores across the three dimensions, the scores were dichotomized and combined in eight different ways. The resulting typology included five different physician profiles: (1) classical paternalists (high scores on paternalism, low scores on both patient autonomy and moral deliberation), (2) modern paternalists (high scores on both paternalism and deliberation, low scores on patient autonomy), (3) autonomists ( high scores on patient autonomy, low scores on both paternalism and deliberation), (4) deliberationists (high scores on deliberation and patient autonomy, low scores on paternalism), and (5) ambivalents (high or low scores on all dimensions, or high or low scores on both paternalism and patient autonomy). The four groups of physicians with 'consistent' attitudes contained between 12 and 19% of the total sample, whereas 37% belonged to the 'ambivalent' group. Laboratory doctors and surgeons belonged significantly more often in the group of classical paternalists than did general practitioners, whereas male physicians were more often modern paternalists than were female physicians. Among the autonomists, women were more numerous than men, doctors in their 40s clearly more numerous than those in their 60s, and psychiatrists clearly more numerous than residents.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11144780     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00224-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  29 in total

1.  Developing patient-centred information for back pain sufferers.

Authors:  Claire Glenton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Staff attitudes and thoughts about the use of coercion in acute psychiatric wards.

Authors:  Tonje Lossius Husum; Johan Haakon Bjørngaard; Arnstein Finset; Torleif Ruud
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 4.328

3.  Physicians' attitudes about communicating and managing scientific uncertainty differ by perceived ambiguity aversion of their patients.

Authors:  David B Portnoy; Paul K J Han; Rebecca A Ferrer; William M P Klein; Steven B Clauser
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-08-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  General practitioners' relationship to sickness certification.

Authors:  Pål Gulbrandsen; Dag Hofoss; Magne Nylenna; Jurate Saltyte-Benth; Olaf G Aasland
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Technological paternalism: on how medicine has reformed ethics and how technology can refine moral theory.

Authors:  Bjørn Hofmann
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  How to reveal disguised paternalism.

Authors:  Niels Lynöe; Niklas Juth; Gert Helgesson
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2009-08-12

7.  Radiologists' responses to inadequate referrals.

Authors:  Kristin Bakke Lysdahl; Bjørn Morten Hofmann; Ansgar Espeland
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  A Cross Cultural Comparison of Attitude of Mental Healthcare Professionals Towards Involuntary Treatment Orders.

Authors:  Ming-Hong Hsieh; Hui-Ching Wu; Frank Huang-Chih Chou; Andrew Molodynski
Journal:  Psychiatr Q       Date:  2017-09

Review 9.  Governance mechanisms in the physician-patient relationship: a literature review and conceptual framework.

Authors:  Gabriela Tofan; Virginia Bodolica; Martin Spraggon
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Directive counsel and morally controversial medical decision-making: findings from two national surveys of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Michael S Putman; John D Yoon; Kenneth A Rasinski; Farr A Curlin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.