Literature DB >> 16391955

Correlating motor performance with surgical error in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

H Hwang1, J Lim, C Kinnaird, A G Nagy, O N M Panton, A J Hodgson, K A Qayumi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analysis of motor performance in minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a new field with applications in surgical training, surgical simulators, and robotics. Force/torque and derivatives of tool tip position (velocity, acceleration, and jerk) are examples of measures of motor performance (MMPs). Few studies have measured MMPs or have correlated MMPs with surgical performance during MIS on humans. The objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of a novel multimodal system to quantify MMPs in laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to attempt to correlate MMPs with the magnitude of error as a measure of surgical performance.
METHODS: Novice and expert surgeons performed laparoscopic cholecystectomies in two groups of three patients each. MMPs were obtained using a combination of optical and electromagnetic tool tip tracking and a force/torque sensor on a modified Maryland dissector. Error scores for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were calculated using a previously validated system. Novice and expert measurements were compared, and correlations were made between error scores and MMPs.
RESULTS: Error scores were similar between novices and experts. Novice surgeons had a significantly greater mean velocity (566 +/- 83 vs 85 +/- 32 mm/s, p = 0.006) and acceleration (2,600 +/- 760 vs 440 +/- 174 mm/s2, p = 0.050) compared to expert surgeons. Force (16.5 +/- 4.6 vs 18.3 +/- 6.0 N, p = 0.829), position (121 +/- 25 vs 135 +/- 72 mm, p = 0.863), and jerk (19,600 +/- 7,410 vs 2,430 +/- 367 mm/s3, p = 0.138) were similar between groups. A positive correlation was found in novice surgeons between error score and jerk (Pearson correlation, 0.999; p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to quantify MMPs in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Novice and expert surgeons can be differentiated by MMPs; moreover, there may be a positive correlation between jerk and error score in novice surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16391955     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0370-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  15 in total

1.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  R Berguer; D L Forkey; W D Smith
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  The use of electromagnetic motion tracking analysis to objectively measure open surgical skill in the laboratory-based model.

Authors:  V Datta; S Mackay; M Mandalia; A Darzi
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.113

Review 3.  Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors and cognitive psychology perspective.

Authors:  Lawrence W Way; Lygia Stewart; Walter Gantert; Kingsway Liu; Crystine M Lee; Karen Whang; John G Hunter
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The relationship between motion analysis and surgical technical assessments.

Authors:  Vivek Datta; Avril Chang; Sean Mackay; Ara Darzi
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  In vivo kinematic measurement during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  M Rasmus; R Riener; S Reiter; A Schneider; H Feussner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Markov modeling of minimally invasive surgery based on tool/tissue interaction and force/torque signatures for evaluating surgical skills.

Authors:  J Rosen; B Hannaford; C G Richards; M N Sinanan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Errors enacted during endoscopic surgery--a human reliability analysis.

Authors:  P Joice; G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Using human reliability analysis to detect surgical error in endoscopic DCR surgery.

Authors:  R Malik; P S White; C J Macewen
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2003-10

9.  Learning to predict human error: issues of acceptability, reliability and validity.

Authors:  N A Stanton; S V Stevenage
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Identification and categorization of technical errors by Observational Clinical Human Reliability Assessment (OCHRA) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B Tang; G B Hanna; P Joice; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2004-11
View more
  12 in total

1.  Characterization of force and torque interactions during a simulated transgastric appendectomy procedure.

Authors:  Saurabh Dargar; Cecilia Brino; Kai Matthes; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Suvranu De
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Intraoperative monitoring of laparoscopic skill development based on quantitative measures.

Authors:  Sayra M Cristancho; Antony J Hodgson; O N M Panton; Adam Meneghetti; Garth Warnock; Karim Qayumi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  A systematic review of performance assessment tools for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yusuke Watanabe; Elif Bilgic; Ekaterina Lebedeva; Katherine M McKendy; Liane S Feldman; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Defining technical errors in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Esther M Bonrath; Nicolas J Dedy; Boris Zevin; Teodor P Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Development of force-based metrics for skills assessment in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Ana Luisa Trejos; Rajni V Patel; Richard A Malthaner; Christopher M Schlachta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Comparison of the performance of experienced and novice surgeons: measurement of gripping force during laparoscopic surgery performed on pigs using forceps with pressure sensors.

Authors:  Azumi Araki; Kazuhide Makiyama; Hiroyuki Yamanaka; Daiki Ueno; Kimito Osaka; Manabu Nagasaka; Takahiro Yamada; Masahiro Yao
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A comparison of NOTES transvaginal and laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures based upon task analysis.

Authors:  Arun Nemani; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Jaisa S Olasky; Souheil Adra; Kurt E Roberts; Lucian Panait; Steven D Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones; Suvranu De
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Development and face validation of a virtual camera navigation task trainer.

Authors:  Venkata Arikatla; Sam Horvath; Yaoyu Fu; Lora Cavuoto; Suvranu De; Steve Schwaitzberg; Andinet Enquobahrie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator.

Authors:  Venkata S Arikatla; Ganesh Sankaranarayanan; Woojin Ahn; Amine Chellali; Suvranu De; G L Caroline; John Hwabejire; Marc DeMoya; Steven Schwaitzberg; Daniel B Jones
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Forces exerted during microneurosurgery: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Hani J Marcus; Kourosh Zareinia; Liu Shi Gan; Fang Wei Yang; Sanju Lama; Guang-Zhong Yang; Garnette R Sutherland
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.