Florent Lalys1, Pierre Jannin. 1. University of Rennes I, LTSI, 35000 , Rennes, France, flo.lalys@hotmail.fr.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Surgery is continuously subject to technological and medical innovations that are transforming daily surgical routines. In order to gain a better understanding and description of surgeries, the field of surgical process modelling (SPM) has recently emerged. The challenge is to support surgery through the quantitative analysis and understanding of operating room activities. Related surgical process models can then be introduced into a new generation of computer-assisted surgery systems. METHODS: In this paper, we present a review of the literature dealing with SPM. This methodological review was obtained from a search using Google Scholar on the specific keywords: "surgical process analysis", "surgical process model" and "surgical workflow analysis". RESULTS: This paper gives an overview of current approaches in the field that study the procedural aspects of surgery. We propose a classification of the domain that helps to summarise and describe the most important components of each paper we have reviewed, i.e., acquisition, modelling, analysis, application and validation/evaluation. These five aspects are presented independently along with an exhaustive list of their possible instantiations taken from the studied publications. CONCLUSION: This review allows a greater understanding of the SPM field to be gained and introduces future related prospects.
PURPOSE: Surgery is continuously subject to technological and medical innovations that are transforming daily surgical routines. In order to gain a better understanding and description of surgeries, the field of surgical process modelling (SPM) has recently emerged. The challenge is to support surgery through the quantitative analysis and understanding of operating room activities. Related surgical process models can then be introduced into a new generation of computer-assisted surgery systems. METHODS: In this paper, we present a review of the literature dealing with SPM. This methodological review was obtained from a search using Google Scholar on the specific keywords: "surgical process analysis", "surgical process model" and "surgical workflow analysis". RESULTS: This paper gives an overview of current approaches in the field that study the procedural aspects of surgery. We propose a classification of the domain that helps to summarise and describe the most important components of each paper we have reviewed, i.e., acquisition, modelling, analysis, application and validation/evaluation. These five aspects are presented independently along with an exhaustive list of their possible instantiations taken from the studied publications. CONCLUSION: This review allows a greater understanding of the SPM field to be gained and introduces future related prospects.
Authors: Warren S Sandberg; Bethany Daily; Marie Egan; James E Stahl; Julian M Goldman; Richard A Wiklund; David Rattner Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: George S Avrunin; Stefan C Christov; Lori A Clarke; Heather M Conboy; Leon J Osterweil; Marco A Zenati Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2018-12-05
Authors: Bernard Gibaud; Germain Forestier; Carolin Feldmann; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Paulo Gonçalves; Tamás Haidegger; Chantal Julliard; Darko Katić; Hannes Kenngott; Lena Maier-Hein; Keno März; Elena de Momi; Dénes Ákos Nagy; Hirenkumar Nakawala; Juliane Neumann; Thomas Neumuth; Javier Rojas Balderrama; Stefanie Speidel; Martin Wagner; Pierre Jannin Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2018-07-13 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: M Wiemuth; D Junger; M A Leitritz; J Neumann; T Neumuth; O Burgert Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2017-05-18 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: George S Avrunin; Lori A Clarke; Heather M Conboy; Leon J Osterweil; Roger D Dias; Steven J Yule; Julian M Goldman; Marco A Zenati Journal: Softw Eng Healthc Syst SEHS IEEE ACM Int Workshop Date: 2018-05