Literature DB >> 12966505

Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects by distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction.

M Abraham Kuriakose1, Yelizaveta Shnayder, Mark D DeLacure.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis is an established technique for the lengthening of long bones and correction of selected craniofacial deformities. Regenerate osteoid bone matrix formed during the distraction phase is malleable and can recreate the three-dimensional form of native bones. Animal experiments and early clinical experience have confirmed that distraction osteogenesis can be used for the reconstruction of segmental bony defects. Herein we discuss the principles of distraction osteogenesis in reference to reconstruction of segmental bony defects and report its clinical application of the mandible continuity defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four patients (age, 7-83 years) with critical segmental mandibular defects (range, 3.5 cm-6.5 cm), resulting from ablative oncologic head and neck surgery underwent primary mandibular reconstruction by transport distraction osteogenesis. Two defects were at the angle and body region, one at the body, and the other at the parasymphysis and body region. Synthes Titanium Multi-vector and Leibinger Multi-guide distractors in bifocal (n = 2) and trifocal (n = 2) architecture were used after the stabilization of the segmental continuity defect using a defect-bridging mandibular reconstruction plate. Osteodistraction was carried out at a rate of 1 mm per day, with once or twice a day rhythm, after a 1-week latency period. The consolidation period was equal to the period of distraction.
RESULTS: All patients tolerated the distraction procedure. Satisfactory bone formation was observed in two patients, and partial bone formation was seen in one patient. Treatment failure was encountered in one patient who had a second oral cavity primary tumor observed during the consolidation period, requiring interruption of the treatment sequence.
CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular reconstruction with distraction osteogenesis is a potentially useful technique in selected patients with segmental mandibular continuity defects after ablative head and neck cancer surgery. Copyright 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12966505     DOI: 10.1002/hed.10294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  8 in total

Review 1.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Experience with mandibular reconstruction using transport-disc-distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lorena Pingarrón-Martín; T González Otero; L J Arias Gallo
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-18

3.  Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.

Authors:  Lucy K Nagashima; Michelle Rondon-Newby; Ibrahim E Zakhary; William W Nagy; Uriel Zapata; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman; Mohammed E Elsalanty
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Radioprotection With Amifostine Enhances Bone Strength and Regeneration and Bony Union in a Rat Model of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Alexis Donneys; Sagar S Deshpande; Deniz Sarhaddi; Noah S Nelson; Laura A Monson; Sara E Dahle; Steve A Goldstein; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.539

5.  Biomechanical characteristics of regenerated cortical bone in the canine mandible.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Lynne A Opperman; Elias Kontogiorgos; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 3.963

6.  Reconstruction of canine mandibular bone defects using a bone transport reconstruction plate.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; Ibrahim Zakhary; Sara Akeel; Byron Benson; Timothy Mulone; Gilbert R Triplett; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  The effects of high dose and highly fractionated radiation on distraction osteogenesis in the murine mandible.

Authors:  Laura A Monson; Christi M Cavaliere; Sagar S Deshpande; Alexander L Ayzengart; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve regeneration by bifocal distraction osteogenesis with retrograde transportation of horseradish peroxidase in dogs.

Authors:  Yosuke Shogen; Emiko Tanaka Isomura; Mikihiko Kogo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.