Literature DB >> 26000082

Experience with mandibular reconstruction using transport-disc-distraction osteogenesis.

Lorena Pingarrón-Martín1, T González Otero2, L J Arias Gallo3.   

Abstract

The goal of transport-disc-distraction osteogenesis (TDDO) is to restore bone continuity by using in-situ bone. It may be useful following trauma, gunshot injuries, or tumor ablation, especially when there may be contraindications at the donor site or for prolonged surgery. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first time TDDO has been used for mandibular reconstruction reporting additional procedures, which include osseointegrated dental implants rehabilitation and orthognathic surgery. A retrospective study is performed analyzing all mandibular reconstruction cases that may be suitable for distraction from January 2006 to December 2011. A thorough description of the documented cases includes details about sex, gender, complications, duration of hospitalization, etiology, size, and location of the defect. Eight cases of mandibular reconstruction were included. Six cases correspond to mandibular ameloblastoma. The remaining two cases were mandibular gunshot comminuted fractures. Range of the defects was from 45 to 60 mm. Length of the transport disc was 15 to 20 mm. Protocolized technique consisted of 5 days of latency period, 19 to 45 days of activation term (average 30 days), and 8 to 12 weeks for consolidation. Mean distraction length achieved was 40.45 mm. We can conclude that TDDO is an alternative to conventional and more invasive procedures, when we face severe segmental mandibular defects reconstruction. It shows the potential to restore a better anatomical bone regeneration, also providing soft tissues and reducing donor-site morbidity. Patients' education and awareness about the proper use of the transport-disc-distraction device is important to optimize functional outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TDDO; ameloblastoma; gunshot injury; mandibular reconstruction; transport-disc-distraction osteogenesis

Year:  2014        PMID: 26000082      PMCID: PMC4428730          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1393729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr        ISSN: 1943-3875


  9 in total

1.  Reconstruction of a large mandibular defect by distraction osteogenesis: a case report.

Authors:  S Basa; E Uner; M Citir; K Aras
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction after mandibular segmental resection.

Authors:  Tetsu Takahashi; Masayuki Fukuda; Takahiro Aiba; Katsuyuki Funaki; Takayoshi Ohnuki; Toshirou Kondoh
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2002-01

3.  Double-step transport distraction osteogenesis in the reconstruction of unilateral large mandibular defects after tumour resection using internal distraction devices.

Authors:  J J Wang; J Chen; F Y Ping; F g Yan
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  Transport disc distraction osteogenesis as an alternative protocol for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Soung Min Kim; Jung Min Park; Hoon Myoung; Jong Ho Lee
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Mandibular functional reconstruction using internal distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Xing Wang; Ye Lin; Biao Yi; Xiaoxia Wang; Cheng Liang; Zili Li
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.628

6.  Internal distraction osteogenesis with a unidirectional device for reconstruction of mandibular segmental defects.

Authors:  Pilar Rubio-Bueno; Luis Naval; Francisco Rodriguez-Campo; José Luis Gil-Díez; Francisco J Díaz-González
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Mandible reconstruction with transport-disc distraction osteogenesis in children of deciduous dentition.

Authors:  Y Liu; J Chen; F Yan; F Ping
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Reconstruction of segmental mandibular defects by distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  M Abraham Kuriakose; Yelizaveta Shnayder; Mark D DeLacure
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 9.  Current status of transport-disc-distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Assuntina G Sacco; Douglas B Chepeha
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 41.316

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.