BACKGROUND: Over 50-% of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are performed using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts. Despite their increased use, there remains little quantitative data on their mechanical behavior. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the quasi-static mechanical and non-linear viscoelastic properties of human semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, as well as the variation of these properties along their length. METHODS: Specimens were subjected to a series of uniaxial tensile tests: 1-h static stress-relaxation test, 30 cycle cyclic stress-relaxation test and load to failure test. To describe the non-linear viscoelastic behavior, the quasi-linear viscoelastic theory was utilized to model data from the static stress-relaxation experiment. FINDINGS: The constants describing the viscoelastic behavior were similar between the proximal and distal halves of the gracilis tendon. The proximal half of the semitendinosus tendon, however, had a greater viscous response than its distal half, which was also significantly higher than the proximal gracilis tendon. In terms of the quasi-static mechanical properties, the properties were similar between the proximal and distal halves of the semitendinosus tendon. However, the distal gracilis tendon showed a significantly higher tangent modulus and ultimate stress compared to its proximal half, which was also significantly higher than the distal semitendinosus tendon. INTERPRETATION: The results of this study demonstrate differences between the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in terms of their quasi-static mechanical and non-linear viscoelastic properties. These results are important for establishing surgical preconditioning protocols and graft selection. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Over 50-% of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions are performed using semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts. Despite their increased use, there remains little quantitative data on their mechanical behavior. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate the quasi-static mechanical and non-linear viscoelastic properties of human semitendinosus and gracilis tendons, as well as the variation of these properties along their length. METHODS: Specimens were subjected to a series of uniaxial tensile tests: 1-h static stress-relaxation test, 30 cycle cyclic stress-relaxation test and load to failure test. To describe the non-linear viscoelastic behavior, the quasi-linear viscoelastic theory was utilized to model data from the static stress-relaxation experiment. FINDINGS: The constants describing the viscoelastic behavior were similar between the proximal and distal halves of the gracilis tendon. The proximal half of the semitendinosus tendon, however, had a greater viscous response than its distal half, which was also significantly higher than the proximal gracilis tendon. In terms of the quasi-static mechanical properties, the properties were similar between the proximal and distal halves of the semitendinosus tendon. However, the distal gracilis tendon showed a significantly higher tangent modulus and ultimate stress compared to its proximal half, which was also significantly higher than the distal semitendinosus tendon. INTERPRETATION: The results of this study demonstrate differences between the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in terms of their quasi-static mechanical and non-linear viscoelastic properties. These results are important for establishing surgical preconditioning protocols and graft selection. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors: Daniel K Moon; Savio L-Y Woo; Yoshiyuki Takakura; Mary T Gabriel; Steven D Abramowitch Journal: J Biomech Date: 2005-04-05 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Behzad Babaei; Steven D Abramowitch; Elliot L Elson; Stavros Thomopoulos; Guy M Genin Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2015-12-06 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Cherice N Hill; Matthew C Coombs; Sarah E Cisewski; Emily L Durham; Daniel J Bonthius; Gregg M Gardner; Ethan C Lopez; Marshall B Wilson; James J Cray; Hai Yao Journal: J Biomech Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Elaine C Schmidt; Matthew Chin; Julien T Aoyama; Theodore J Ganley; Kevin G Shea; Michael W Hast Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-01-23
Authors: Emily C Vafek; Johannes F Plate; Eric Friedman; Sandeep Mannava; Aaron T Scott; Kerry A Danelson Journal: Muscles Ligaments Tendons J Date: 2018-01-10