Literature DB >> 12962924

A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes.

Lee A Learman1, Robert L Summitt, R Edward Varner, S Gene McNeeley, Deborah Goodman-Gruen, Holly E Richter, Feng Lin, Jonathan Showstack, Christine C Ireland, Eric Vittinghoff, Stephen B Hulley, A Eugene Washington.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare surgical complications and clinical outcomes after total versus supracervical abdominal hysterectomy for control of abnormal uterine bleeding, symptomatic uterine leiomyomata, or both.
METHODS: We conducted a randomized intervention trial in four US clinical centers among 135 patients who had abdominal hysterectomy for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata, abnormal uterine bleeding refractory to hormonal treatment, or both. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a total or supracervical hysterectomy performed using the surgeon's customary technique. Using an intention-to-treat approach, we compared surgical complications and clinical outcomes for 2 years after randomization.
RESULTS: Sixty-eight participants were assigned to supracervical hysterectomy (SCH) and 67 to total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Hysterectomy by either technique led to statistically significant reductions in most symptoms, including pelvic pain or pressure, back pain, urinary incontinence, and voiding dysfunction. Patients randomly assigned to (SCH) tended to have more hospital readmissions than those randomized to TAH, but this difference was not statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of complications, degree of symptom improvement, or activity limitation. Participants weighing more than 100 kg at study entry were twice as likely to be readmitted to the hospital during the 2-year follow-up period (relative risk [RR] 2.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06, 4.48, P=.034).
CONCLUSION: We found no statistically significant differences between (SCH) and TAH in surgical complications and clinical outcomes during 2 years of follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12962924     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00664-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  27 in total

1.  Cervical stump prolapse complicating laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in a nulliparous woman.

Authors:  J Cory Barnett; Stephen R Guy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-10

2.  Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: 10 steps toward a successful procedure.

Authors:  Jon I Einarsson; Yoko Suzuki
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

3.  Acute uterine bleeding unrelated to pregnancy: a Southern California Permanente Medical Group practice guideline.

Authors:  Malcolm G Munro
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2013

4.  Prognosis of women with apparent stage I endometrial cancer who had supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Hiroko Machida; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Jocelyn Garcia-Sayre; Annie A Yessaian; Lynda D Roman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  Voiding dysfunction and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Christopher Jayne; Bianca A Gago
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  The Design of a Randomized Trial of Vaginal Surgery for Uterovaginal Prolapse: Vaginal Hysterectomy With Native Tissue Vault Suspension Versus Mesh Hysteropexy Suspension (The Study of Uterine Prolapse Procedures Randomized Trial).

Authors:  Charles W Nager; Halina Zyczynski; Rebecca G Rogers; Matthew D Barber; Holly E Richter; Anthony G Visco; Charles R Rardin; Heidi Harvie; Dennis Wallace; Susan F Meikle
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Indications and Route of Hysterectomy for Benign Diseases. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S3 Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/070, April 2015)

Authors:  K J Neis; W Zubke; T Römer; K Schwerdtfeger; T Schollmeyer; S Rimbach; B Holthaus; E Solomayer; B Bojahr; F Neis; C Reisenauer; B Gabriel; H Dieterich; I B Runnenbaum; W Kleine; A Strauss; M Menton; I Mylonas; M David; L-C Horn; D Schmidt; P Gaß; A T Teichmann; P Brandner; W Stummvoll; A Kuhn; M Müller; M Fehr; K Tamussino
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 8.  Sexual function in women with pelvic floor disorders.

Authors:  Rebecca G Rogers
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  The effect of uterine fibroid embolization on lower urinary tract symptoms.

Authors:  David Shveiky; Cheryl B Iglesia; Danielle D Antosh; Bela I Kudish; Joanna Peterson; Chun-Chih Huang; Chun-Chin Huang; James B Spies
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Trends in the national distribution of laparoscopic hysterectomies from 2003 to 2010.

Authors:  Jinhyung Lee; Kristofer Jennings; Mostafa A Borahay; Ana M Rodriguez; Gokhan S Kilic; Russell R Snyder; Pooja R Patel
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.