Literature DB >> 17351718

Cervical stump prolapse complicating laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy in a nulliparous woman.

J Cory Barnett1, Stephen R Guy.   

Abstract

A resurgence of supracervical hysterectomies is being seen, as providers are becoming more comfortable with minimally invasive surgery. Proponents of this technique advocate that leaving the cervix prevents the disruption of proper anatomical relationships, which allows better apical support of the vagina. We report a case of cervical stump prolapse 6 months after a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) in a 36-year-old, nulliparous, obese woman who demonstrated excellent uterine support before her surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17351718     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-007-0328-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct


  8 in total

1.  Outcomes after total versus subtotal abdominal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Ranee Thakar; Susan Ayers; Peter Clarkson; Stuart Stanton; Isaac Manyonda
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  Todd R Jenkins
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Removal of the retained cervical stump.

Authors:  Wesley S Hilger; Antonio R Pizarro; Javier F Magrina
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Posthysterectomy vault prolapse.

Authors:  J W Barrington; G Edwards
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2000

5.  True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse. Thirteen years of experience.

Authors:  M Marchionni; G L Bracco; V Checcucci; A Carabaneanu; E M Coccia; F Mecacci; G Scarselli
Journal:  J Reprod Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 0.142

6.  Long term outcome following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy.

Authors:  E O Okaro; K D Jones; C Sutton
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.531

7.  Randomised controlled trial of total compared with subtotal hysterectomy with one-year follow up results.

Authors:  Helga Gimbel; Vibeke Zobbe; Birthe Margrethe Andersen; Thomas Filtenborg; Christian Gluud; Ann Tabor
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.531

8.  A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Lee A Learman; Robert L Summitt; R Edward Varner; S Gene McNeeley; Deborah Goodman-Gruen; Holly E Richter; Feng Lin; Jonathan Showstack; Christine C Ireland; Eric Vittinghoff; Stephen B Hulley; A Eugene Washington
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.661
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.