Literature DB >> 12945984

Signal detectability in digital radiography: spatial domain figures of merit.

Robert M Gagne1, Jonathan S Boswell, Kyle J Myers.   

Abstract

The usefulness of Fourier-based measures of imaging performance has come into question for the evaluation of digital imaging systems. Figures of merit such as detective quantum efficiency (DQE) based on Fourier domain parameters are relevant for linear, shift-invariant systems with stationary noise. However, no digital imaging system is shift invariant, and realistic images do not satisfy the stationarity condition. Our methods for the task-based evaluation of imaging systems, based on signal detectability in the spatial domain, do not require such assumptions. We have computed the performance of ideal and quasi-ideal observers for the task of signal detection in digital radiography. Signal detectability in terms of an observer signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) has been compared to results obtained from a Monte Carlo simulation of the digital image-acquisition process. The simulation incorporates the effects of random amplification and secondary quantum blur, integration over pixel area, and electronic noise. The observer figures of merit that have been previously shown to bracket human performance directly specify the usefulness of the images for the stated diagnostic task. In addition, the observer figures of merit give a task-dependent measure of imaging system efficiency in terms of the ratio of an output SNR2 to an input SNR2. Thus, the concept of "detective quantum efficiency" reappears in a natural way but based in the spatial domain and not dependent on shift invariance and stationarity assumptions. With respect to the optimum amount of system blur, our simulations indicate that under certain task-dependent conditions, large signals are fairly insensitive to blur in the x-ray transducer, while an optimum blur is found for small signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12945984     DOI: 10.1118/1.1578485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  7 in total

1.  DR with a DSLR: Digital Radiography with a Digital Single-Lens Reflex camera.

Authors:  Helen Fan; Heather L Durko; Stephen K Moore; Jared Moore; Brian W Miller; Lars R Furenlid; Sunil Pradhan; Harrison H Barrett
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010-02-15

2.  Beyond noise power in 3D computed tomography: the local NPS and off-diagonal elements of the Fourier domain covariance matrix.

Authors:  Angel R Pineda; Daniel J Tward; Antonio Gonzalez; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Implementation of a channelized Hotelling observer model to assess image quality of x-ray angiography systems.

Authors:  Christopher P Favazza; Kenneth A Fetterly; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Shuai Leng; Beth A Schueler
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-03-25

4.  Influence of image metrics when assessing image quality from a test object in cardiac X-ray systems: Part II.

Authors:  Roberto Sanchez; Eliseo Vano; Carlos Ubeda; Jose M Fernandez; Stephen Balter; Bart Hoornaert
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Influence of image metrics when assessing image quality from a test object in cardiac X-ray systems.

Authors:  Eliseo Vano; Carlos Ubeda; Bernhard Geiger; Luis C Martinez; Stephen Balter
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Review: update on selection of optimal radiopharmaceuticals for clinical trials.

Authors:  Lawrence E Williams; George Lopatin; Daniel D Kaplan; An Liu; Jeffrey Y C Wong
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.099

7.  Biplane interventional pediatric system with cone-beam CT: dose and image quality characterization for the default protocols.

Authors:  Eva Corredoira; Eliseo Vañó; Luis Alejo; Carlos Ubeda; Federico Gutiérrez-Larraya; Julia Garayoa
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.