Literature DB >> 12944484

The checkpoint protein Rad24 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is involved in processing double-strand break ends and in recombination partner choice.

Yael Aylon1, Martin Kupiec.   

Abstract

Upon chromosomal damage, cells activate a checkpoint response that includes cell cycle arrest and a stimulation of DNA repair. The checkpoint protein Rad24 is key to the survival of a single, repairable double-strand break (DSB). However, the low survival of rad24 cells is not due to their inability to arrest cell cycle progression. In rad24 mutants, processing of the broken ends is delayed and protracted, resulting in extended kinetics of DSB repair and in cell death. The limited resection of rad24 mutants also affects recombination partner choice by a mechanism dependent on the length of the interacting homologous donor sequences. Unexpectedly, rad24 cells with a DSB eventually accumulate and die at the G(2)/M phase of the cell cycle. This arrest depends on the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12944484      PMCID: PMC193701          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.23.18.6585-6596.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  42 in total

1.  The relationship between homology length and crossing over during the repair of a broken chromosome.

Authors:  O Inbar; B Liefshitz; G Bitan; M Kupiec
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-10-06       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Double-strand break repair in the absence of RAD51 in yeast: a possible role for break-induced DNA replication.

Authors:  A Malkova; E L Ivanov; J E Haber
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function.

Authors:  G L Kiser; T A Weinert
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 4.  Cell cycle checkpoints, genomic integrity, and cancer.

Authors:  L Hartwell; T Weinert; L Kadyk; B Garvik
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1994

5.  Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest.

Authors:  D Lydall; T Weinert
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription.

Authors:  A Aboussekhra; J E Vialard; D E Morrison; M A de la Torre-Ruiz; L Cernáková; F Fabre; N F Lowndes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-08-01       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Mating-type suppression of the DNA-repair defect of the yeast rad6 delta mutation requires the activity of genes in the RAD52 epistasis group.

Authors:  Y X Yan; R H Schiestl; L Prakash
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.886

8.  Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery, and chromosome loss.

Authors:  L L Sandell; V A Zakian
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  The frequency of meiotic recombination in yeast is independent of the number and position of homologous donor sequences: implications for chromosome pairing.

Authors:  J E Haber; W Y Leung; R H Borts; M Lichten
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Fission yeast rad17: a homologue of budding yeast RAD24 that shares regions of sequence similarity with DNA polymerase accessory proteins.

Authors:  D J Griffiths; N C Barbet; S McCready; A R Lehmann; A M Carr
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1995-12-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  34 in total

1.  Physical links between the nuclear envelope protein Mps3, three alternate replication factor C complexes, and a variant histone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Jared Haas; Amanda Lemoncelli; Christina Morozov; Karl Franke; John Dominder; Lisa M Antoniacci
Journal:  DNA Cell Biol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.311

Review 2.  Similarities and differences between "uncapped" telomeres and DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  James M Dewar; David Lydall
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.316

3.  The S-phase checkpoint is required to respond to R-loops accumulated in THO mutants.

Authors:  Belén Gómez-González; Irene Felipe-Abrio; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Role of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad53 checkpoint kinase in signaling double-strand breaks during the meiotic cell cycle.

Authors:  Hugo Cartagena-Lirola; Ilaria Guerini; Nicola Manfrini; Giovanna Lucchini; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  Mutants defective in Rad1-Rad10-Slx4 exhibit a unique pattern of viability during mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Amy M Lyndaker; Tamara Goldfarb; Eric Alani
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Mph1 and Mus81-Mms4 prevent aberrant processing of mitotic recombination intermediates.

Authors:  Gerard Mazón; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 7.  Genetic instability in budding and fission yeast-sources and mechanisms.

Authors:  Adrianna Skoneczna; Aneta Kaniak; Marek Skoneczny
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 16.408

8.  The Mre11 nuclease is not required for 5' to 3' resection at multiple HO-induced double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Bertrand Llorente; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Transcription of a donor enhances its use during double-strand break-induced gene conversion in human cells.

Authors:  Ezra Schildkraut; Cheryl A Miller; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 10.  Taming the tiger by the tail: modulation of DNA damage responses by telomeres.

Authors:  David Lydall
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.