Literature DB >> 22203190

Similarities and differences between "uncapped" telomeres and DNA double-strand breaks.

James M Dewar1, David Lydall.   

Abstract

Telomeric DNA is present at the ends of eukaryotic chromosomes and is bound by telomere "capping" proteins, which are the (Cdc13-Stn1-Ten1) CST complex, Ku (Yku70-Yku80), and Rap1-Rif1-Rif2 in budding yeast. Inactivation of any of these complexes causes telomere "uncapping," stimulating a DNA damage response (DDR) that frequently involves resection of telomeric DNA and stimulates cell cycle arrest. This is presumed to occur because telomeres resemble one half of a DNA double-strand break (DSB). In this review, we outline the DDR that occurs at DSBs and compare it to the DDR occurring at uncapped telomeres, in both budding yeast and metazoans. We give particular attention to the resection of DSBs in budding yeast by Mre11-Xrs2-Rad50 (MRX), Sgs1/Dna2, and Exo1 and compare their roles at DSBs and uncapped telomeres. We also discuss how resection uncapped telomeres in budding yeast is promoted by the by 9-1-1 complex (Rad17-Mec3-Ddc1), to illustrate how analysis of uncapped telomeres can serve as a model for the DDR elsewhere in the genome. Finally, we discuss the role of the helicase Pif1 and its requirement for resection of uncapped telomeres, but not DSBs. Pif1 has roles in DNA replication and mammalian and plant CST complexes have been identified and have roles in global genome replication. Based on these observations, we suggest that while the DDR at uncapped telomeres is partially due to their resemblance to a DSB, it may also be partially due to defective DNA replication. Specifically, we propose that the budding yeast CST complex has dual roles to inhibit a DSB-like DDR initiated by Exo1 and a replication-associated DDR initiated by Pif1. If true, this would suggest that the mammalian CST complex inhibits a Pif1-dependent DDR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22203190     DOI: 10.1007/s00412-011-0357-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chromosoma        ISSN: 0009-5915            Impact factor:   4.316


  151 in total

1.  Structure-based predictions of Rad1, Rad9, Hus1 and Rad17 participation in sliding clamp and clamp-loading complexes.

Authors:  C Venclovas; M P Thelen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination.

Authors:  Marie Frank-Vaillant; Stéphane Marcand
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.970

3.  Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins.

Authors:  Michael Lisby; Jacqueline H Barlow; Rebecca C Burgess; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2004-09-17       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  p53- and ATM-dependent apoptosis induced by telomeres lacking TRF2.

Authors:  J Karlseder; D Broccoli; Y Dai; S Hardy; T de Lange
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  MRX protects telomeric DNA at uncapped telomeres of budding yeast cdc13-1 mutants.

Authors:  Steven S Foster; Mikhajlo K Zubko; Sandrine Guillard; David Lydall
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-12

6.  TRF2/RAP1 and DNA-PK mediate a double protection against joining at telomeric ends.

Authors:  Oriane Bombarde; Céline Boby; Dennis Gomez; Philippe Frit; Marie-Josèphe Giraud-Panis; Eric Gilson; Bernard Salles; Patrick Calsou
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Exo1 and Rad24 differentially regulate generation of ssDNA at telomeres of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cdc13-1 mutants.

Authors:  Mikhajlo K Zubko; Sandrine Guillard; David Lydall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Telomerase is essential to alleviate pif1-induced replication stress at telomeres.

Authors:  Michael Chang; Brian Luke; Claudine Kraft; Zhijian Li; Matthias Peter; Joachim Lingner; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Conserved telomere maintenance component 1 interacts with STN1 and maintains chromosome ends in higher eukaryotes.

Authors:  Yulia V Surovtseva; Dmitri Churikov; Kara A Boltz; Xiangyu Song; Jonathan C Lamb; Ross Warrington; Katherine Leehy; Michelle Heacock; Carolyn M Price; Dorothy E Shippen
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  The yeast Ku heterodimer is essential for protection of the telomere against nucleolytic and recombinational activities.

Authors:  R M Polotnianka; J Li; A J Lustig
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  35 in total

1.  To trim or not to trim: progression and control of DSB end resection.

Authors:  Magda Granata; Davide Panigada; Elena Galati; Federico Lazzaro; Achille Pellicioli; Paolo Plevani; Marco Muzi-Falconi
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Nature vs nurture: interplay between the genetic control of telomere length and environmental factors.

Authors:  Yaniv Harari; Gal-Hagit Romano; Lior Ungar; Martin Kupiec
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Hypermutation in human cancer genomes: footprints and mechanisms.

Authors:  Steven A Roberts; Dmitry A Gordenin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 4.  Towards physiological complexity with in vitro single-molecule biophysics.

Authors:  Daniel Duzdevich; Eric C Greene
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Exo1 phosphorylation status controls the hydroxyurea sensitivity of cells lacking the Pol32 subunit of DNA polymerases delta and zeta.

Authors:  Lillian Doerfler; Kristina H Schmidt
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2014-12

6.  Mutations in the telomere capping complex in bone marrow failure and related syndromes.

Authors:  Amanda J Walne; Tanya Bhagat; Michael Kirwan; Cyril Gitiaux; Isabelle Desguerre; Norma Leonard; Elena Nogales; Tom Vulliamy; Inderjeet S Dokal
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.941

7.  Ku DNA End-Binding Activity Promotes Repair Fidelity and Influences End-Processing During Nonhomologous End-Joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Charlene H Emerson; Christopher R Lopez; Albert Ribes-Zamora; Erica J Polleys; Christopher L Williams; Lythou Yeo; Jacques E Zaneveld; Rui Chen; Alison A Bertuch
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Sharpening the ends for repair: mechanisms and regulation of DNA resection.

Authors:  Sharad C Paudyal; Zhongsheng You
Journal:  Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai)       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.848

Review 9.  DNA in motion during double-strand break repair.

Authors:  Judith Miné-Hattab; Rodney Rothstein
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 20.808

Review 10.  Checkpoint Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  David P Waterman; James E Haber; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 23.643

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.