Literature DB >> 12942279

Efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography.

John F Bruzzi1, Alan C Moss, Darren D Brennan, Padraic MacMathuna, Helen M Fenlon.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the efficacy of IV Buscopan as a muscle relaxant in CT colonography in terms of colonic distension and polyp detection, and to determine its particular efficacy in patients with diverticular disease. Seventy-three consecutive patients were randomised to receive IV Buscopan or no muscle relaxant prior to CT colonography. CT colonography was performed using a Siemens Somatom 4-detector multislice CT scanner. The following parameters were recorded: degree of colonic distension using a 4-point scale; diagnostic adequacy of colonic distension; presence or absence of diverticular disease; and presence of colonic polyps. Accuracy of polyp detection was assessed using subsequent conventional colonoscopy as a gold standard. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the number of segments that were deemed to be optimally or adequately distended (p=0.37). Although IV Buscopan did improve distension of certain segments, this effect was not sufficient to improve the number of diagnostically adequate studies in the Buscopan group (p=0.14). In patients with diverticular disease, IV Buscopan did not have any significant effect on segments affected by diverticulosis but was associated with an improvement in distension of more proximal segments. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of polyp detection (p=0.34). The addition of prone scanning to supine scanning was found to be the most useful technique for maximising colonic distension. Intravenous Buscopan at CT colonography does not improve the overall adequacy of colonic distension nor the accuracy of polyp detection. In patients with sigmoid diverticular disease IV Buscopan improves distension of more proximal colonic segments and may be useful in selected cases, but our results do not support its routine use for CT colonography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12942279     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2012-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  Utility of intravenously administered contrast material at CT colonography.

Authors:  M M Morrin; R J Farrell; J B Kruskal; K Reynolds; J B McGee; V Raptopoulos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  A K Hara; C D Johnson; J E Reed; D A Ahlquist; H Nelson; R L MacCarty; W S Harmsen; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Retrograde ileography: value of glucagon.

Authors:  L H Monsein; R D Halpert; E D Harris; P J Feczko
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Cancer statistics, 1999.

Authors:  S H Landis; T Murray; S Bolden; P A Wingo
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients.

Authors:  J G Fletcher; C D Johnson; T J Welch; R L MacCarty; D A Ahlquist; J E Reed; W S Harmsen; L A Wilson
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  CT colonography: colonic distention improved by dual positioning but not intravenous glucagon.

Authors:  Martina M Morrin; Richard J Farrell; Mary T Keogan; Jonathan B Kruskal; Chun-Shan Yam; Vassilios Raptopoulos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Antispasmodic drugs to reduce discomfort and colonic spasm during barium enemas: comparison of oral hyoscyamine, i.v. glucagon, and no drug.

Authors:  J G Bova; R A Jurdi; W F Bennett
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Anaphylactic and allergic reactions during double-contrast studies: is glucagon or barium suspension the allergen?

Authors:  D W Gelfand; J C Sowers; K A DePonte; T E Sumner; D J Ott
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps.

Authors:  A H Dachman; J K Kuniyoshi; C M Boyle; Y Samara; K R Hoffmann; D T Rubin; I Hanan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Use of antispasmodic drugs in double contrast barium enema examination: glucagon or buscopan?

Authors:  R Goei; M Nix; A H Kessels; M P Ten Tusscher
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  12 in total

1.  CT colonography with fecal tagging after incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Gryspeerdt; P Lefere; M Herman; R Deman; L Rutgeerts; G Ghillebert; F Baert; M Baekelandt; B Van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  The future of virtual colonography. Interview by Paul C Adams.

Authors:  Helen Fenlon
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Management of diverticulitis.

Authors:  Simon E J Janes; Allan Meagher; Frank A Frizelle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-02-04

4.  European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography.

Authors:  Stuart A Taylor; Andrea Laghi; Philippe Lefere; Steve Halligan; Jaap Stoker
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Importance of extracolonic findings at IV contrast medium-enhanced CT colonography versus those at non-enhanced CT colonography.

Authors:  Adrian Spreng; Peter Netzer; Joerg Mattich; Hans-Peter Dinkel; Peter Vock; Hanno Hoppe
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  CT colonography: an update.

Authors:  Andrik J Aschoff; Andrea S Ernst; Hans-Juergen Brambs; Markus S Juchems
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  CT colonography in cancer detection: methods and results.

Authors:  Wolfgang Schima; Thomas Mang
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 8.  Role of CT colonography in symptomatic assessment, surveillance and screening.

Authors:  L Maximilian Almond; Douglas M Bowley; Sharad S Karandikar; Shuvro H Roy-Choudhury
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Computed tomography colonography for the practicing radiologist: A review of current recommendations on methodology and clinical indications.

Authors:  Paola Scalise; Annalisa Mantarro; Francesca Pancrazi; Emanuele Neri
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-28

Review 10.  Computed tomography colonography in 2014: an update on technique and indications.

Authors:  Andrea Laghi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.