Literature DB >> 9314963

Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity.

A K Hara1, C D Johnson, J E Reed, D A Ahlquist, H Nelson, R L MacCarty, W S Harmsen, D M Ilstrup.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To estimate the sensitivity and specificity of computed tomographic (CT) colography in detection of colorectal polyps and to compare these findings with those at axial CT.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 70 consecutive patients, CT colography and colonoscopy were performed. Helical axial CT images and CT colographic images (multiplanar two- and three-dimensional endoluminal images) were evaluated separately by two radiologists blinded to results from colonoscopy and other imaging studies. Findings were compared with those at colonoscopy, which was the standard.
RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity for the two observers with CT colography averaged 75% and 90% in patients with adenomas 10 mm in diameter or larger, 66% and 63% in patients with adenomas 5 mm in diameter or greater, and 45% and 80% for patients with adenomas less than 5 mm in diameter, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity with axial CT were lower than those with CT colography (58% and 74%, respectively) in patients with adenomas 10 mm in diameter or larger.
CONCLUSION: Compared with axial CT, CT colography appears to have superior sensitivity and specificity in detection of clinically important colorectal adenomas. Early performance of CT colography seems promising for detection of colorectal polyps 5 mm and larger.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9314963     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.205.1.9314963

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  29 in total

1.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening.

Authors:  C D Johnson; D A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  CT colonography and colorectal screening.

Authors:  A S Chaoui; M A Blake
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Trends in CT colonography.

Authors:  J F Bruzzi; D D Brennan; H M Fenlon
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2001-10

Review 4.  Virtual colonoscopy.

Authors:  S Halligan; H M Fenlon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-06

5.  High-definition resolution three-dimensional imaging systems in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: randomized comparative study with high-definition resolution two-dimensional systems.

Authors:  Hidefumi Kinoshita; Ken Nakagawa; Yukio Usui; Masatsugu Iwamura; Akihiro Ito; Akira Miyajima; Akio Hoshi; Yoichi Arai; Shiro Baba; Tadashi Matsuda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Virtual endoscopy: current perspectives.

Authors:  Hajime Kuwayama; Mamoru Iimuro; Yoshinori Kitazumi; Gordon Luk
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.527

7.  A new filtering algorithm for medical magnetic resonance and computer tomography images.

Authors:  E Stoll; C Stern; P Stucki; S Wildermuth
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Screening for colon cancer.

Authors:  J P Heiken
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

9.  CT attenuation of colorectal polypoid lesions: evaluation of contrast enhancement in CT colonography.

Authors:  Aytekin Oto; Veli Gelebek; Berna Sayan Oguz; Bülent Sivri; Ahmet Deger; Okan Akhan; Aytekin Besim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-12-12       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): climax of a new era of validation and transition into community practice.

Authors:  Jacob Thomas; Jeffrey Carenza; Elizabeth McFarland
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.