Literature DB >> 12932927

Radical perineal prostatectomy: cost efficient, outcome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management.

Michael J Harris1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Localized prostate cancer is a common disease for which minimally invasive treatment methods are being explored. Perineal prostatectomy, as a historical open procedure, is modified to incorporate contemporary surgical ideas. There is relatively little in the literature regarding modern adaptations of perineal prostatectomy. This method of anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy has been developed to accomplish a minimally invasive method of achieving goals of disease control and preservation of genito-urinary functions.
METHODS: Prospective outcome data is accumulated on 508 consecutive radical perineal prostatectomies by a single surgeon. Pathologic stage and PSA detectability are measures of cancer control. Pad use and ability to complete intercourse measure urinary and sexual function. General complications and other outcome measures are evaluated.
RESULTS: Freedom from PSA detectability by pathologic stage is 96.3%, 79.4%, and 69.4% for organ confined, specimen confined and margin positive in the absence of seminal vesical invasion with an average 4 years follow up (3-114 months). Margins are positive in 18% of cases. The average cancer size is 9.4g and 36% of cases have extracapsular invasion. By the first, third, sixth months and one year, 38%, 65%, 88% and 96% are free of pad use and report being dry. While over 80% of nerve-spared patients enjoy the return of spontaneous erectile function, the men with bilateral nerve preservation note earlier and more complete return of function. There are no cardiopulmonary complications or deaths. Transfusions occurred in 1%, none in the past 400 cases. Average total hospital charges are USD$4889.00 in 1999 and 2000. Anterior urethral strictures, anastomotic strictures and fecal urgency/stress flatus occur 2%, 2% and 2-4%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This method of prostatectomy is able to achieve complete cancer resection while preserving urinary and sexual function as well as laparoscopic or retropubic prostatectomy. The simplicity and minimally invasive nature of this procedure contribute to a short recovery and low overall cost of therapy. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy is a cost-efficient, outcome effective minimally invasive method of treating men with localized prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12932927     DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00298-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  15 in total

1.  Radical perineal prostatectomy: a learning curve?

Authors:  Fadi Eliya; Ken Kernen; Jose Gonzalez; Ken Peters; Ibrahim Ibrahim; Kaylyn Petzel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Radical prostatectomy--too soon to abandon the perineal approach?

Authors:  Vinod H Nargund; Faruquz Zaman
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Experience with radical perineal prostatectomy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Evi Comploj; Armin Pycha
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-06

5.  Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases.

Authors:  Peiguo G Chu; Sean K Lau; Lawrence M Weiss; Mark Kawachi; Jeffrey Yoshida; Christopher Ruel; Rebecca Nelson; Laura Crocitto; Timothy Wilson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Radical perineal prostatectomy: Our initial experience.

Authors:  Mustafa Güneş; Mehmet Akyüz; Fatih Uruç; Bekir Aras; Muammer Altok; Mehmet Umul
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-06

Review 7.  Post-prostatectomy incontinence: Etiology, evaluation, and management.

Authors:  Nirmish Singla; Ajay K Singla
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2014-03

8.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Michael Lipke; Chandru P Sundaram
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Impact of capsular incision on biochemical recurrence after radical perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  K W Kwak; H M Lee; H Y Choi
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Robot-assisted radical perineal prostatectomy: first experience of 15 cases.

Authors:  Volkan Tuğcu; Oktay Akça; Abdulmuttalip Şimşek; İsmail Yiğitbaşı; Selçuk Şahin; Ali İhsan Taşçı
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.