Literature DB >> 20882343

Radical perineal prostatectomy: a learning curve?

Fadi Eliya1, Ken Kernen, Jose Gonzalez, Ken Peters, Ibrahim Ibrahim, Kaylyn Petzel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine a learning curve for radical perineal prostatectomy after formal training in radical retropubic prostatectomy.
METHODS: Using the William Beaumont Hospital Prostatectomy database, we analyzed peri-operative data from two surgeons performing radical perineal prostatectomies from their initial 96 cases to determine a learning curve.
RESULTS: Over time, data between the first and last quarters showed consistent, excellent results in terms of skin time (143 SD ± 22 and 136 SD ± 24 min), blood loss (310 SD ± 120 and 335 ± 216 cc), and length of stay (1.3 SD ± 0.6 and 1.2 SD ± 0.5 days), without significant change. However, only two positive margins were obtained in the 4th quartile representing a significant change and possibly representing a learning curve.
CONCLUSIONS: These data show that excellent, reproducible results can be obtained using basic surgical principles, without incorporating expensive technology and resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20882343     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-010-9781-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  6 in total

1.  Specific complications of radical perineal prostatectomy: a single institution study of more than 600 cases.

Authors:  Rolf Gillitzer; Sebastian W Melchior; Christian Hampel; Christoph Wiesner; Jan Fichtner; Joachim W ThUroff
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve?

Authors:  S Duke Herrell; Joseph A Smith
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical perineal prostatectomy: a viable alternative to radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  D A Levy; M I Resnick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: a contemporary and anatomic approach.

Authors:  M J Harris; I M Thompson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Radical perineal prostatectomy: cost efficient, outcome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Michael J Harris
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Radical prostatectomy: the pros and cons of the perineal versus retropubic approach.

Authors:  H A Frazier; J E Robertson; D F Paulson
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

  6 in total
  4 in total

1.  The evolution and resurgence of perineal prostatectomy in the robotic surgical era.

Authors:  Juan Garisto; Riccardo Bertolo; Clark A Wilson; Jihad Kaouk
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Experience with radical perineal prostatectomy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Evi Comploj; Armin Pycha
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-06

3.  Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy outcome data: how should surgeon's performance be reported? A retrospective learning curve analysis of two surgeons.

Authors:  Sarah Mason; Mieke Van Hemelrijck; Ashish Chandra; Christian Brown; Declan Cahill
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-07-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.