Literature DB >> 21475327

Radical prostatectomy--too soon to abandon the perineal approach?

Vinod H Nargund1, Faruquz Zaman.   

Abstract

Perineal radical prostatectomy (PRP) is one of the oldest surgical procedures for prostate cancer, but its use has declined over the past 30 years. New studies show that PRP is not only minimally invasive but beneficial from an economic perspective and should not yet be abandoned in the treatment of early prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21475327     DOI： 10.1038/nrurol.2011.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN： 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  8 in total

1.  Comparative effectiveness of perineal versus retropubic and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sandip M Prasad; Xiangmei Gu; Rebecca Lavelle; Stuart R Lipsitz; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  A comparison of the relative merits of radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  L D Sullivan; M J Weir; J F Kinahan; D L Taylor
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 3.  New concepts in the treatment of stage D1 adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  M S Austenfeld; B E Davis
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  A comparison of radical retropubic with perineal prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer within the Uniformed Services Urology Research Group.

Authors:  R S Lance; P A Freidrichs; C Kane; C R Powell; E Pulos; J W Moul; D G McLeod; R L Cornum
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Scott V Burgess; Fatih Atug; Erik P Castle; Rodney Davis; Raju Thomas
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Radical prostatectomy by the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approach: 12 years of experience in one center.

Authors:  Laurent Salomon; Olivier Levrel; Alexandre de la Taille; Aristotelis G Anastasiadis; Fabien Saint; Safawat Zaki; Dimitrios Vordos; Antony Cicco; L Eric Olsson; Andras Hoznek; Dominique Chopin; Clement-Claude Abbou
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 7.  Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Alberto Briganti; Michael L Blute; James H Eastham; Markus Graefen; Axel Heidenreich; Jeffrey R Karnes; Francesco Montorsi; Urs E Studer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Radical perineal prostatectomy: cost efficient, outcome effective, minimally invasive prostate cancer management.

Authors:  Michael J Harris
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 20.096
  8 in total
  6 in total

1.  Experience with radical perineal prostatectomy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Evi Comploj; Armin Pycha
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2012-06

2.  The effects of retropubic and perineal radical prostatectomy techniques on postoperative urinary continence after surgery: Results of 196 patients.

Authors:  Alper Kafkaslı; Mustafa Yücel Boz; Muhsin Balaban; Rahim Horuz; Ahmet Selimoğlu; Selami Albayrak; Önder Cangüven
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2013-09

3.  Case for resurgence of radical perineal prostatecomy in Indian subcontinent.

Authors:  Rajeev Sood; Nikhil Khattar; Rishi Nayyar; Sachin Kathuria; Vineet Narang; Devashish Kaushal
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-10

4.  Radical perineal prostatectomy - the contemporary resurgence of a genuinely minimally invasive procedure: Procedure outline. Comparison of the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of different surgical techniques of treating organ-confined prostate cancer (PCa). A literature review with special focus on perineal prostatectomy.

Authors:  Stanisław Wroński
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2012-09-04

5.  Is Radical Perineal Prostatectomy a Viable Therapeutic Option for Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer?

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Hwang Gyun Jeon; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Hyun Moo Lee; Han Yong Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Transperineal single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with Si da Vinci surgical system: initial experience and description of technique.

Authors:  Kangxin Ni; Dingwei Xue; Gonghui Li
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.241
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.