Literature DB >> 29130441

Is the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) Independent of Personality?

Yu-Hsiang Wu1, Kelsey Dumanch1, Elizabeth Stangl1, Christi Miller2, Kelly Tremblay2, Ruth Bentler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-report questionnaires are a frequently used method of evaluating hearing aid outcomes. Studies have shown that personality can account for 5-20% of the variance in response to self-report measures. As a result, these influences can impact results and limit their generalizability when the purpose of the study is to examine the technological merit of hearing aids. To reduce personality influences on self-report outcome data, the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) was developed. The DOSO is meant to demonstrate outcomes of the amplification device relatively independent of the individual's personality. Still, it is unknown if the DOSO achieves its original goal.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between personality and the DOSO. The relationship between personality and several widely used hearing-related questionnaires was also examined. RESEARCH
DESIGN: This is a nonexperimental study using a correlational design. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 119 adult hearing aid wearers participated in the study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The NEO Five-Factor Inventory was used to measure five personality traits (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness). The initial (unaided) hearing disablement, residual (aided) hearing disablement, and hearing aid benefit and satisfaction was measured using the DOSO, Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly/Adult, Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, and Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life. The relationship between personality and each questionnaire was examined using a correlation analysis.
RESULTS: All of the DOSO subscales were found to be significantly correlated to personality, regardless of whether age and better-ear hearing thresholds were controlled. Individuals who reported poorer hearing aid outcomes tended to have higher Neuroticism scores, while those who scored higher in Extraversion, Openness, and Agreeableness were more likely to report better outcomes. Across DOSO subscales, the maximum variance explained by personality traits ranged from 6% to 11%. Consistent with the literature, ∼3-18% of the variance of other hearing-related questionnaires was attributable to personality.
CONCLUSIONS: The degree to which personality affects the DOSO is similar to other hearing-related questionnaires. Although the variance accounted for by personality is not large, researchers and clinicians should not assume that the results of the DOSO are independent of personality. American Academy of Audiology

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29130441      PMCID: PMC6013071          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.16142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  19 in total

Review 1.  Belief and feeling: evidence for an accessibility model of emotional self-report.

Authors:  Michael D Robinson; Gerald L Clore
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Digital noise reduction: outcomes from laboratory and field studies.

Authors:  Ruth Bentler; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Jerrica Kettel; Richard Hurtig
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Ziad S Nasreddine; Natalie A Phillips; Valérie Bédirian; Simon Charbonneau; Victor Whitehead; Isabelle Collin; Jeffrey L Cummings; Howard Chertkow
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Personality trait structure as a human universal.

Authors:  R R McCrae; P T Costa
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1997-05

5.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Authors:  D Watson; L A Clark; A Tellegen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

6.  Components and determinants of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Refinement and psychometric evaluation of the Attitudes Toward Loss of Hearing Questionnaire.

Authors:  G H Saunders; K M Cienkowski
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Who wants a hearing aid? Personality profiles of hearing aid seekers.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Ginger A Gray
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Genevieve C Alexander; Ginger A Gray
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit.

Authors:  R M Cox; G C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Effects of Amplification on Listening Self-Efficacy in Adults With Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lauren Kawaguchi; Yu-Hsiang Wu; Christi Miller
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Importance of personality and coping expectancy on patient-reported hearing disability, quality of life and distress level: a study of patients referred to an audiology service.

Authors:  Øyvind Nordvik; Peder O Laugen Heggdal; K Jonas Brännström; Anne Kari Aarstad; Hans Jørgen Aarstad
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.186

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.