Literature DB >> 12917795

Effects of electron-beam irradiation on buccal-cell DNA.

Philip E Castle1, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Tracie Franklin, Stephen Chanock, Vinita Puri, Robert Welch, Nathaniel Rothman, Jim Vaught.   

Abstract

Buccal cells were collected from 29 participants, by use of mouthwash rinses, and were split into equal aliquots, with one aliquot irradiated by electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation equivalent to the sterilizing dosage used by the U.S. Postal Service and the other left untreated. Aliquots were extracted and tested for DNA yields (e.g., TaqMan assay for quantifying human genomic DNA), genomic integrity, and amplification-based analysis of genetic variants (e.g., single-nucleotide polymorphisms [SNPs] and single tandem repeats [STRs]). Irradiated aliquots had lower median DNA yields (3.7 microg/aliquot) than untreated aliquots (7.6 microg/aliquot) (P<.0005) and were more likely to have smaller maximum DNA fragment size, on the basis of genomic integrity gels, than untreated aliquots (P<.0005). Irradiated aliquots showed poorer PCR amplification of a 989-bp beta-globin target (97% for weak amplification and 3% for no amplification) than untreated aliquots (7% for weak amplification and 0% for no amplification) (P<.0005), but 536-bp and 268-bp beta-globin targets were amplified from all aliquots. There was no detectable irradiation effect on SNP assays, but there was a significant trend for decreased detection of longer STRs (P=.01) in irradiated versus untreated aliquots. We conclude that E-beam irradiation reduced the yield and quality of buccal-cell specimens, and, although irradiated buccal-cell specimens may retain sufficient DNA integrity for some amplified analyses of many common genomic targets, assays that target longer DNA fragments (>989 bp) or require whole-genome amplification may be compromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12917795      PMCID: PMC1180689          DOI: 10.1086/378077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  11 in total

1.  A model for predicting the frequency of high pesticide exposure events in the Agricultural Health Study.

Authors:  D T Mage; M C Alavanja; D P Sandler; C J McDonnell; B Kross; A Rowland; A Blair
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Performance evaluation of two multiplexes used in fluorescent short tandem repeat DNA analysis.

Authors:  Edward L Buse; Jeanne C Putinier; Mary M Hong; Aimee E Yap; John M Hartmann
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.832

3.  Rapid quantification of DNA samples extracted from buccal scrapes prior to DNA profiling.

Authors:  A Hopwood; N Oldroyd; S Fellows; R Ward; S A Owen; K Sullivan
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.993

4.  Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study.

Authors:  L Le Marchand; A Lum-Jones; B Saltzman; V Visaya; A M Nomura; L N Kolonel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash.

Authors:  M García-Closas; K M Egan; J Abruzzo; P A Newcomb; L Titus-Ernstoff; T Franklin; P K Bender; J C Beck; L Le Marchand; A Lum; M Alavanja; R B Hayes; J Rutter; K Buetow; L A Brinton; N Rothman
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Simple non-invasive method to obtain DNA for gene analysis.

Authors:  N Lench; P Stanier; R Williamson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-06-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Sample preparation and PCR amplification from paraffin-embedded tissues.

Authors:  C E Greer; C M Wheeler; M M Manos
Journal:  PCR Methods Appl       Date:  1994-06

8.  The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status.

Authors:  J K Gohagan; P C Prorok; R B Hayes; B S Kramer
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2000-12

9.  Collection of genomic DNA by buccal swabs for polymerase chain reaction-based biomarker assays.

Authors:  A H Walker; D Najarian; D L White; J F Jaffe; P A Kanetsky; T R Rebbeck
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Performance of high-throughput DNA quantification methods.

Authors:  Kashif A Haque; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Michael B Beerman; Jeff P Struewing; Stephen J Chanock; Andrew W Bergen
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 2.563

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of the effects of sterilisation techniques on subsequent DNA profiling.

Authors:  Kirsty Shaw; Ivana Sesardić; Nikki Bristol; Carole Ames; Kathryn Dagnall; Caryn Ellis; Fiona Whittaker; Barbara Daniel
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.686

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.