Literature DB >> 10378997

Collection of genomic DNA by buccal swabs for polymerase chain reaction-based biomarker assays.

A H Walker1, D Najarian, D L White, J F Jaffe, P A Kanetsky, T R Rebbeck.   

Abstract

Studies in molecular and genetic epidemiology require a high-throughput, low cost, and reliable means of genomic DNA collection. Buccal (cheek) swabs have been proposed as a means of achieving these goals, but there is little information about the practical application of this approach. From January 1995 to December 1997, we processed 995 buccal swabs for use in polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based genotype assays in the context of ongoing molecular epidemiologic studies. Six hundred forty-seven of these swabs were processed immediately after collection and 348 were received by mail. We were able to obtain at least one genotype from 99.7% (645 of 647) of fresh-processed and 97.4% (330 of 339) of mailed biosamples. A PCR success rate of 90.3% (2,546 genotypes from 2,819 assays) was achieved. Genotypes were obtained from 96.1% (1, 865 genotypes from 1,941 assays) of fresh-processed biosamples and 77.6% (681 genotypes from 878 assays) of mailed biosamples. PCR success rates at any single locus ranged from 92.6 to 98.8% (fresh-processed) and 75.5 to 79.6% (mailed). The PCR success rate among fresh-processed biosamples was significantly higher than among mailed biosamples (Fisher's exact test p < 0.0001), and more attempts were required to obtain a successful PCR result for mailed biosamples as compared to fresh-processed biosamples. For one locus (CYP3A4), a subset of mailed biosamples was purified if two or more PCR failures occurred. Additional genotypes were obtained in 58.3% of these previously failed biosamples. Time from biosample receipt to DNA extraction had no effect on PCR success. After storage of processed biosamples for as long as 3 years, there was no appreciable decrease in the rate of PCR success. These results suggest that adequate DNA for PCR-based applications can be obtained from buccal swabs, but sampling or processing considerations may be important in obtaining optimal results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10378997      PMCID: PMC1566681          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.99107517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  17 in total

1.  Forensic identification of urine samples.

Authors:  B Brinkmann; S Rand; T Bajanowski
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.686

2.  Routine use of hair root or buccal swab specimens for PCR analysis: advantages over using blood.

Authors:  D M Thomson; N N Brown; A E Clague
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1992-05-15       Impact factor: 3.786

3.  Non-invasive isolation of constitutional DNA for genetic analysis.

Authors:  K Tobal; D M Layton; G J Mufti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-11-25       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  DNA microextraction from dried blood spots on filter paper blotters: potential applications to newborn screening.

Authors:  E R McCabe; S Z Huang; W K Seltzer; M L Law
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Rapid isolation of DNA from complex biological samples using a novel capture reagent--methidium-spermine-sepharose.

Authors:  J D Harding; G Gebeyehu; R Bebee; D Simms; L Klevan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-09-12       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Amplification of DNA from epithelial cells in urine.

Authors:  P Gasparini; A Savoia; P F Pignatti; B Dallapiccola; G Novelli
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  DNA typing from single hairs.

Authors:  R Higuchi; C H von Beroldingen; G F Sensabaugh; H A Erlich
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1988-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Simple non-invasive method to obtain DNA for gene analysis.

Authors:  N Lench; P Stanier; R Williamson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-06-18       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Modification of clinical presentation of prostate tumors by a novel genetic variant in CYP3A4.

Authors:  T R Rebbeck; J M Jaffe; A H Walker; A J Wein; S B Malkowicz
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1998-08-19       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  GSTM1 null polymorphism at the glutathione S-transferase M1 locus: phenotype and genotype studies in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis.

Authors:  M H Davies; E Elias; S Acharya; W Cotton; G C Faulder; A A Fryer; R C Strange
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 23.059

View more
  50 in total

1.  Associations between cannabinoid receptor-1 (CNR1) variation and hippocampus and amygdala volumes in heavy cannabis users.

Authors:  Joseph P Schacht; Kent E Hutchison; Francesca M Filbey
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  The human T locus and spina bifida risk.

Authors:  Liselotte E Jensen; Sandrine Barbaux; Katy Hoess; Sven Fraterman; Alexander S Whitehead; Laura E Mitchell
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2004-09-24       Impact factor: 4.132

3.  Peri-Implant Sulcus Fluid (PISF) Matrix Metalloproteinase (MMP) -8 Levels in Peri-Implantitis.

Authors:  René Thierbach; Kurt Maier; Timo Sorsa; Päivi Mäntylä
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-05-01

4.  Decision tree-based modeling of androgen pathway genes and prostate cancer risk.

Authors:  Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Xiaowei Guan; Charnita Zeigler-Johnson; Neal J Meropol; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  A transdisciplinary model integrating genetic, physiological, and psychological correlates of voluntary exercise.

Authors:  Angela Bryan; Kent E Hutchison; Douglas R Seals; David L Allen
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Development and validation of the high-quality 'rapid method for swab' to genotype the HTTLPR serotonin transporter (SLC6A4) promoter polymorphism.

Authors:  Bryan Maloney; Balmiki Ray; Elizabeth P Hayden; John I Nurnberger; Debomoy K Lahiri
Journal:  Psychiatr Genet       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.458

7.  Aberrant interchromosomal exchanges are the predominant cause of the 22q11.2 deletion.

Authors:  Sulagna C Saitta; Stacy E Harris; Ann P Gaeth; Deborah A Driscoll; Donna M McDonald-McGinn; Melissa K Maisenbacher; Jill M Yersak; Prabir K Chakraborty; April M Hacker; Elaine H Zackai; Terry Ashley; Beverly S Emanuel
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2003-12-17       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  What keeps a body moving? The brain-derived neurotrophic factor val66met polymorphism and intrinsic motivation to exercise in humans.

Authors:  Ann E Caldwell Hooper; Angela D Bryan; Martin S Hagger
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-05-08

9.  Individual and additive effects of the CNR1 and FAAH genes on brain response to marijuana cues.

Authors:  Francesca M Filbey; Joseph P Schacht; Ursula S Myers; Robert S Chavez; Kent E Hutchison
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 7.853

10.  Relationship of early-onset baldness to prostate cancer in African-American men.

Authors:  Charnita Zeigler-Johnson; Knashawn H Morales; Elaine Spangler; Bao-Li Chang; Timothy R Rebbeck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.